Janet Buckenmeyer

564 total citations
24 papers, 324 citations indexed

About

Janet Buckenmeyer is a scholar working on Education, Computer Science Applications and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Buckenmeyer has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 324 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Education, 5 papers in Computer Science Applications and 5 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Janet Buckenmeyer's work include Online and Blended Learning (16 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (5 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (5 papers). Janet Buckenmeyer is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (16 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (5 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (5 papers). Janet Buckenmeyer collaborates with scholars based in United States. Janet Buckenmeyer's co-authors include Emily Hixon, Casimir Barczyk and Lori Feldman and has published in prestigious journals such as The Internet and Higher Education, American Journal of Distance Education and Online Learning.

In The Last Decade

Janet Buckenmeyer

22 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janet Buckenmeyer United States 11 257 66 53 42 35 24 324
Emily Hixon United States 10 326 1.3× 60 0.9× 40 0.8× 57 1.4× 67 1.9× 22 395
Erkan Tekınarslan Türkiye 8 232 0.9× 54 0.8× 56 1.1× 29 0.7× 39 1.1× 32 329
Ercan Kiraz Türkiye 9 284 1.1× 38 0.6× 38 0.7× 29 0.7× 32 0.9× 31 359
David L. Silvernail United States 9 276 1.1× 73 1.1× 36 0.7× 19 0.5× 48 1.4× 46 343
Marilyn Leask United Kingdom 9 219 0.9× 72 1.1× 20 0.4× 27 0.6× 58 1.7× 38 312
Geoffrey Ian Romeo United States 4 209 0.8× 78 1.2× 43 0.8× 29 0.7× 53 1.5× 12 279
Loretta Donovan United States 10 275 1.1× 102 1.5× 54 1.0× 27 0.6× 61 1.7× 25 340
Robert Blomeyer United States 5 331 1.3× 72 1.1× 32 0.6× 51 1.2× 118 3.4× 13 407
Sue Trinidad Australia 8 190 0.7× 39 0.6× 29 0.5× 19 0.5× 28 0.8× 33 247
Trond Eiliv Hauge Norway 12 264 1.0× 105 1.6× 22 0.4× 20 0.5× 83 2.4× 18 352

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Buckenmeyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Buckenmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Buckenmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Buckenmeyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Buckenmeyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Buckenmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Buckenmeyer. The network helps show where Janet Buckenmeyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Buckenmeyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Buckenmeyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Buckenmeyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Buckenmeyer. Janet Buckenmeyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barczyk, Casimir, et al.. (2017). The Effect of Age and Employment on Students’ Perceptions of Online Course Quality. American Journal of Distance Education. 31(3). 173–184. 9 indexed citations
2.
Hixon, Emily, et al.. (2016). Online Course Quality: What Do Nontraditional Students Value?. Online journal of distance learning administration. 19(4). 2 indexed citations
3.
Buckenmeyer, Janet, et al.. (2015). Technology’s role in learning at a commuter campus: The student perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 40(3). 412–431. 8 indexed citations
4.
Buckenmeyer, Janet, Emily Hixon, Casimir Barczyk, & Lori Feldman. (2013). Does Participation In A Faculty Distance Education Mentoring Program Comprehensively Improve Teaching Methods. International journal on e-learning. 12(2). 139–152. 5 indexed citations
5.
Hixon, Emily, Janet Buckenmeyer, Casimir Barczyk, & Lori Feldman. (2011). Assessing the Impact of Faculty Development for Online Instructors. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2011(1). 672–681. 2 indexed citations
6.
Hixon, Emily, Casimir Barczyk, Janet Buckenmeyer, & Lori Feldman. (2011). Mentoring University Faculty to become High Quality Online Educators: A Program Evaluation.. Online journal of distance learning administration. 14(4). 21 indexed citations
7.
Barczyk, Casimir, Janet Buckenmeyer, Lori Feldman, & Emily Hixon. (2011). Assessment of a University‐Based Distance Education Mentoring Program from a Quality Management Perspective. Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning. 19(1). 5–24. 15 indexed citations
8.
Hixon, Emily, et al.. (2011). Beyond the early adopters of online instruction: Motivating the reluctant majority. The Internet and Higher Education. 15(2). 102–107. 37 indexed citations
9.
Barczyk, Casimir, Janet Buckenmeyer, & Lori Feldman. (2010). Mentoring Professors: A Model for Developing Quality Online Instructors and Courses in Higher Education. International journal on e-learning. 9(1). 7–26. 13 indexed citations
10.
Hixon, Emily, et al.. (2010). Designing High-Impact Faculty Programs for Online Course Development. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2010(1). 1771–1777. 1 indexed citations
11.
Hixon, Emily, et al.. (2010). Hitting a Moving Target: Meeting Faculty Needs for Online Course Development. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2010(1). 1778–1783. 1 indexed citations
12.
Buckenmeyer, Janet, et al.. (2010). Wanted: Quality Online Instructors and Courses? Try this Successful Mentoring Model. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2010(1). 921–926. 1 indexed citations
13.
Buckenmeyer, Janet. (2010). Beyond Computers In The Classroom: Factors Related To Technology Adoption To Enhance Teaching And Learning. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER). 3(4). 27–27. 32 indexed citations
14.
Hixon, Emily & Janet Buckenmeyer. (2009). Revisiting Technology Integration in Schools: Implications for Professional Development. Computers in the Schools. 26(2). 130–146. 85 indexed citations
15.
Buckenmeyer, Janet, et al.. (2008). Assessing Students for Online Learning. International journal on e-learning. 7(3). 449–461. 13 indexed citations
16.
Buckenmeyer, Janet, et al.. (2008). YouTube.com for Teachers: A Useful Resource or Just More Hijinks?. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2008(1). 4118–4119. 1 indexed citations
18.
Buckenmeyer, Janet. (2007). Effective Technology Integration: Essential Conditions for Success. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2007(1). 2955–2960. 1 indexed citations
19.
Buckenmeyer, Janet. (2006). Is Technology an Effective Tool to Improve Schools? Two Views. Educational technology: The magazine for managers of change in education. 46(2). 54–56. 2 indexed citations
20.
Buckenmeyer, Janet. (2001). Lessons Learned from a University Partnership Established To Promote the Adoption of Educational Technology: One Size Does Not Fit All..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026