564 total citations 24 papers, 324 citations indexed
About
Janet Buckenmeyer is a scholar working on Education, Computer Science Applications and Gender Studies.
According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Buckenmeyer has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 324 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Education, 5 papers in Computer Science Applications and 5 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Janet Buckenmeyer's work include Online and Blended Learning (16 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (5 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (5 papers). Janet Buckenmeyer is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (16 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (5 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (5 papers). Janet Buckenmeyer collaborates with scholars based in United States. Janet Buckenmeyer's co-authors include Emily Hixon, Casimir Barczyk and Lori Feldman and has published in prestigious journals such as The Internet and Higher Education, American Journal of Distance Education and Online Learning.
In The Last Decade
Janet Buckenmeyer
22 papers
receiving
280 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Buckenmeyer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Buckenmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Buckenmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Buckenmeyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Buckenmeyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Buckenmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Buckenmeyer. The network helps show where Janet Buckenmeyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Buckenmeyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Buckenmeyer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Buckenmeyer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Buckenmeyer. Janet Buckenmeyer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hixon, Emily, et al.. (2016). Online Course Quality: What Do Nontraditional Students Value?. Online journal of distance learning administration. 19(4).2 indexed citations
Buckenmeyer, Janet, Emily Hixon, Casimir Barczyk, & Lori Feldman. (2013). Does Participation In A Faculty Distance Education Mentoring Program Comprehensively Improve Teaching Methods. International journal on e-learning. 12(2). 139–152.5 indexed citations
5.
Hixon, Emily, Janet Buckenmeyer, Casimir Barczyk, & Lori Feldman. (2011). Assessing the Impact of Faculty Development for Online Instructors. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2011(1). 672–681.2 indexed citations
6.
Hixon, Emily, Casimir Barczyk, Janet Buckenmeyer, & Lori Feldman. (2011). Mentoring University Faculty to become High Quality Online Educators: A Program Evaluation.. Online journal of distance learning administration. 14(4).21 indexed citations
Barczyk, Casimir, Janet Buckenmeyer, & Lori Feldman. (2010). Mentoring Professors: A Model for Developing Quality Online Instructors and Courses in Higher Education. International journal on e-learning. 9(1). 7–26.13 indexed citations
10.
Hixon, Emily, et al.. (2010). Designing High-Impact Faculty Programs for Online Course Development. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2010(1). 1771–1777.1 indexed citations
11.
Hixon, Emily, et al.. (2010). Hitting a Moving Target: Meeting Faculty Needs for Online Course Development. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2010(1). 1778–1783.1 indexed citations
12.
Buckenmeyer, Janet, et al.. (2010). Wanted: Quality Online Instructors and Courses? Try this Successful Mentoring Model. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2010(1). 921–926.1 indexed citations
Buckenmeyer, Janet, et al.. (2008). Assessing Students for Online Learning. International journal on e-learning. 7(3). 449–461.13 indexed citations
16.
Buckenmeyer, Janet, et al.. (2008). YouTube.com for Teachers: A Useful Resource or Just More Hijinks?. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2008(1). 4118–4119.1 indexed citations
Buckenmeyer, Janet. (2007). Effective Technology Integration: Essential Conditions for Success. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2007(1). 2955–2960.1 indexed citations
19.
Buckenmeyer, Janet. (2006). Is Technology an Effective Tool to Improve Schools? Two Views. Educational technology: The magazine for managers of change in education. 46(2). 54–56.2 indexed citations
20.
Buckenmeyer, Janet. (2001). Lessons Learned from a University Partnership Established To Promote the Adoption of Educational Technology: One Size Does Not Fit All..
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.