Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals’ Concerns About Organizational Practices1
19961.6k citationsH. Jeff Smith, Sandra Milberg et al.MIS Quarterlyprofile →
Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency
1991951 citationsSandra Milberg, ROBERT W. LAWSON et al.Journal of Consumer Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Milberg
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Milberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Milberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Milberg more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Milberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Milberg. The network helps show where Sandra Milberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra Milberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra Milberg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra Milberg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra Milberg. Sandra Milberg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Milberg, Sandra. (2001). POSITIVE FEEDBACK EFFECTS OF BRAND EXTENSIONS: EXPANDING BRAND MEANING AND THE RANGE OF EXTENDIBILITY *. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 4(1). 3–35.1 indexed citations
Smith, H. Jeff, Sandra Milberg, & Sandra J. Burke. (1996). Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals’ Concerns About Organizational Practices1. MIS Quarterly. 20(2). 167–196.1614 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Zinkhan, George M. & Sandra Milberg. (1995). Deception in Survey Research: a Cross-Cultural, Managerial Perspective. ACR North American Advances.2 indexed citations
15.
Burke, Sandra J. & Sandra Milberg. (1993). The Role of Ethical Concerns in Consumer Purchase Behavior: Understanding Alternative Processes. ACR North American Advances. 20(1). 119–122.13 indexed citations
16.
McCarthy, Michael, et al.. (1993). The Effects of Direct and Associative Brand Extension Strategies on Consumer Response to Brand Extensions. ACR North American Advances.62 indexed citations
17.
Milberg, Sandra, et al.. (1991). Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency. Journal of Consumer Research. 18(2). 185–185.951 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
LAWSON, ROBERT W., et al.. (1989). Memory Structure of Brand Names. ACR North American Advances.28 indexed citations
19.
Milberg, Sandra & Margaret S. Clark. (1988). Moods and compliance. British Journal of Social Psychology. 27(1). 79–90.27 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.