Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency

951 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1991, received 951 indexed citations. Written by Sandra Milberg and ROBERT W. LAWSON covering the research area of Social Psychology, Marketing and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Marketing (851 citations), Sociology and Political Science (418 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (271 citations). Published in Journal of Consumer Research.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1086/209251 →

Countries where authors are citing Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/209251.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026