Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals’ Concerns About Organizational Practices1
19961.6k citationsH. Jeff Smith, Sandra Milberg et al.MIS Quarterlyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Jeff Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Jeff Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Jeff Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Jeff Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Jeff Smith. The network helps show where H. Jeff Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Jeff Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Jeff Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Jeff Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H. Jeff Smith. H. Jeff Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Keil, Mark, et al.. (2015). How Values Shape Concerns about Privacy for Self and Others. International Conference on Information Systems.6 indexed citations
Thompson, Ronald L., Charalambos L. Iacovou, & H. Jeff Smith. (2009). Beyond user acceptance: The determinants of the intention to produce user created contents on the internet. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 11–4.1 indexed citations
11.
Smith, H. Jeff. (2008). But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate Domain. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 3(2). 6.2 indexed citations
12.
Xu, Heng, Tamara Dinev, H. Jeff Smith, & Paul Hart. (2008). EXAMINING THE FORMATION OF INDIVIDUAL 'S PRIVACY CONCERNS : TOWARD AN INTEGRATIVE VIEW. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 6.240 indexed citations
13.
Iacovou, Charalambos L., H. Jeff Smith, & Ronald L. Thompson. (2005). The Linkage Between Reporting Quality and Performance in Information Systems Projects. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.5 indexed citations
14.
Smith, H. Jeff. (2004). Information Privacy and its Management.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 3(4). 6.14 indexed citations
Smith, H. Jeff. (2003). The Shareholders vs. Stakeholders Debate. MIT Sloan management review. 44(4). 85–91.130 indexed citations
17.
Smith, H. Jeff. (2002). Ethics and information systems. ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems. 33(3). 8–22.27 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.