Ruth Garner

4.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
61 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Ruth Garner is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Garner has authored 61 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 27 papers in Education and 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Ruth Garner's work include Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (26 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (21 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (14 papers). Ruth Garner is often cited by papers focused on Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (26 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (21 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (14 papers). Ruth Garner collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Ruth Garner's co-authors include Patricia A. Alexander, Mark G. Gillingham, Patricia A. Alexander, Marilyn J. Chambliss, Jonna M. Kulikowich, Rachel Brown, Victoria Chou Hare, George B. Macready, et al and Peter Winograd and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Computers in Human Behavior and Review of Educational Research.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Garner

57 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Metacognition and reading comprehension 1987 2026 2000 2013 1987 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth Garner United States 26 2.3k 1.5k 685 283 222 61 3.1k
Ralph E. Reynolds United States 24 1.6k 0.7× 923 0.6× 1.1k 1.7× 268 0.9× 259 1.2× 54 2.8k
Joseph C. Campione United States 26 3.0k 1.3× 1.7k 1.1× 665 1.0× 325 1.1× 300 1.4× 58 4.1k
Kenneth A. Kiewra United States 28 1.5k 0.7× 1.5k 1.0× 1.4k 2.0× 251 0.9× 202 0.9× 96 2.9k
Marcel V. J. Veenman Netherlands 29 3.5k 1.6× 2.6k 1.7× 656 1.0× 341 1.2× 375 1.7× 45 4.5k
Barak Rosenshine United States 24 2.1k 0.9× 2.9k 1.9× 290 0.4× 143 0.5× 273 1.2× 61 4.2k
Nancy L. Stein United States 27 1.4k 0.6× 738 0.5× 574 0.8× 231 0.8× 476 2.1× 75 2.7k
Peter Afflerbach United States 23 3.2k 1.4× 2.5k 1.6× 463 0.7× 278 1.0× 169 0.8× 52 4.5k
Earl C. Butterfield United States 25 1.1k 0.5× 667 0.4× 444 0.6× 233 0.8× 236 1.1× 63 2.3k
Richard L. Venezky United States 22 1.8k 0.8× 911 0.6× 515 0.8× 284 1.0× 79 0.4× 89 2.8k
Douglas J. Hacker United States 21 1.4k 0.6× 1.2k 0.8× 420 0.6× 211 0.7× 258 1.2× 45 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Garner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Garner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Garner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Garner. The network helps show where Ruth Garner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Garner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Garner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Garner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Garner. Ruth Garner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Garner, Ruth, et al.. (2001). Virtual tutor training – The JOB Experience. 2001(1). 551–556. 1 indexed citations
2.
Garner, Ruth & Mark G. Gillingham. (1999). New Voices: The Internet Communication of High School Kids Who (Usually) Won't Write. ˜The œHigh School journal. 82(3). 172. 2 indexed citations
3.
Garner, Ruth. (1998). Epilogue: Choosing to Learn or Not-Learn in School. Educational Psychology Review. 10(2). 227–237. 6 indexed citations
4.
Gillingham, Mark G. & Ruth Garner. (1992). Readers' Comprehension of Mazes Embedded in Expository Texts. The Journal of Educational Research. 85(4). 234–241. 6 indexed citations
5.
Garner, Ruth. (1990). When Children and Adults Do Not Use Learning Strategies: Toward a Theory of Settings. Review of Educational Research. 60(4). 517–529. 307 indexed citations
6.
Garner, Ruth & Mark G. Gillingham. (1987). Students' Knowledge of Text Structure. Journal of Reading Behavior. 19(3). 247–259. 8 indexed citations
7.
Garner, Ruth, et al.. (1986). Children's knowledge of structural properties of expository text.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 78(6). 411–416. 15 indexed citations
8.
Garner, Ruth, et al.. (1985). Synthesis of Research on Students' Ability to Summarize Text.. Educational leadership. 42(5). 52–55. 9 indexed citations
9.
Garner, Ruth, et al.. (1985). Multiple Measures of Text Summarization Proficiency: What Can Fifth-Grade Students Do?. Research in the Teaching of English. 19(2). 140–153. 9 indexed citations
10.
Garner, Ruth. (1984). Rules for Summarizing Texts: Is Classroom Instruction Being Provided?.. The Journal of Educational Research. 77(5). 2 indexed citations
11.
Garner, Ruth & Victoria Chou Hare. (1984). Efficacy of Text Lookback Training for Poor Comprehenders at Two Age Levels. The Journal of Educational Research. 77(6). 376–381. 7 indexed citations
12.
Alexander, Patricia A., Victoria Chou Hare, & Ruth Garner. (1984). The Effects of Time, Access, and Question Type on Response Accuracy and Frequency of Lookbacks in Older, Proficient Readers. Journal of Reading Behavior. 16(2). 119–130. 12 indexed citations
13.
Garner, Ruth, et al.. (1984). Inducing Use of a Text Lookback Strategy Among Unsuccessful Readers. American Educational Research Journal. 21(4). 789–798. 49 indexed citations
14.
Garner, Ruth, et al.. (1983). Externalizing Question-Answering Strategies of Good and Poor Comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly. 18(4). 439–439. 33 indexed citations
15.
Alexander, Patricia A. & Ruth Garner. (1982). EFFECTS OF REALISTIC AND UNREALISTIC CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE ON THE STUDYING BEHAVIOR OF EXPERT ADULT READERS. Reading Psychology. 3(4). 311–324. 2 indexed citations
16.
Garner, Ruth. (1982). Verbal-Report Data on Reading Strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior. 14(2). 159–167. 50 indexed citations
17.
Garner, Ruth. (1982). Efficient Text Summarization Costs and Benefits. The Journal of Educational Research. 75(5). 275–279. 54 indexed citations
18.
Garner, Ruth, et al.. (1981). Good and Poor Comprehender Differences in Knowing and Regulating Reading Behaviors.. Educational research quarterly. 6(4). 5–12. 82 indexed citations
19.
Garner, Ruth & Patricia A. Alexander. (1981). Use of Passage Cues in Answering of Questions: Investigation of the Effects of an Explicit External Criterion on Adults' Studying Behavior. Journal of Reading Behavior. 13(4). 335–346. 7 indexed citations
20.
Garner, Ruth, et al.. (1981). Monitoring-of-Understanding Research. The Journal of Experimental Education. 50(2). 70–76. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026