Ruth Blatt

975 total citations
10 papers, 651 citations indexed

About

Ruth Blatt is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Blatt has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 651 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Ruth Blatt's work include Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (3 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers). Ruth Blatt is often cited by papers focused on Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (3 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers). Ruth Blatt collaborates with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Israel. Ruth Blatt's co-authors include Elizabeth George, Susan J. Ashford, Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, Marlys K. Christianson, Marilynn M. Rosenthal, Peter Anderson, Eric J. Neuman, Adam M. Grant, Scott Sonenshein and Christopher Marquis and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Review, Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Relations.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Blatt

10 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth Blatt United States 7 267 193 150 126 99 10 651
Ingo Weller Germany 13 457 1.7× 147 0.8× 126 0.8× 177 1.4× 82 0.8× 34 787
Alina Baluch Germany 11 388 1.5× 211 1.1× 99 0.7× 167 1.3× 39 0.4× 27 663
Christopher D. Zatzick Canada 17 469 1.8× 165 0.9× 236 1.6× 182 1.4× 65 0.7× 29 925
Melissa W. Barringer United States 8 259 1.0× 156 0.8× 175 1.2× 83 0.7× 69 0.7× 13 591
Jonathan Westover United States 12 326 1.2× 213 1.1× 130 0.9× 70 0.6× 64 0.6× 106 731
Monique Veld Netherlands 12 509 1.9× 133 0.7× 196 1.3× 117 0.9× 53 0.5× 19 767
Amanda Pyman Australia 10 276 1.0× 165 0.9× 123 0.8× 87 0.7× 42 0.4× 39 648
Lynette Harris United Kingdom 16 412 1.5× 233 1.2× 105 0.7× 98 0.8× 44 0.4× 34 787
Stefan Süß Germany 16 333 1.2× 158 0.8× 148 1.0× 83 0.7× 36 0.4× 63 693
Jordi Trullén Spain 15 384 1.4× 97 0.5× 101 0.7× 143 1.1× 37 0.4× 29 663

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Blatt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Blatt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Blatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Blatt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Blatt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Blatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Blatt. The network helps show where Ruth Blatt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Blatt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Blatt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Blatt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Blatt. Ruth Blatt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Kark, Ronit, et al.. (2023). A woman’s got to be what a woman’s got to be? How managerial assessment centers perpetuate gender inequality. Human Relations. 77(6). 832–863. 5 indexed citations
2.
Matthews, Alicia K., et al.. (2022). Self-Description of a University–Community Partnership to Advocate for Restroom Access Policy Change in Chicago. Progress in community health partnerships. 16(4). 563–572. 1 indexed citations
3.
Blatt, Ruth. (2022). “I don’t need advice but I will take it”: Allied labor in transgender allyship. Sexualities. 27(3). 733–752. 3 indexed citations
4.
Blatt, Ruth. (2009). RESILIENCE IN ENTREPRENEURIAL TEAMS: DEVELOPING THE CAPACITY TO PULL THROUGH. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 29(11). 1. 38 indexed citations
5.
Blatt, Ruth. (2009). Tough Love: How Communal Schemas and Contracting Practices Build Relational Capital in Entrepreneurial Teams. Academy of Management Review. 34(3). 533–551. 119 indexed citations
6.
Blatt, Ruth. (2008). Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Temporary Knowledge Employees. Organization Studies. 29(6). 849–866. 30 indexed citations
7.
Ashford, Susan J., Elizabeth George, & Ruth Blatt. (2007). 2 Old Assumptions, New Work. Academy of Management Annals. 1(1). 65–117. 136 indexed citations
8.
Ashford, Susan J., Elizabeth George, & Ruth Blatt. (2007). 2 Old Assumptions, New Work. Academy of Management Annals. 1(1). 65–117. 124 indexed citations
9.
Anderson, Peter, Ruth Blatt, Marlys K. Christianson, et al.. (2006). Understanding Mechanisms in Organizational Research. Journal of Management Inquiry. 15(2). 102–113. 99 indexed citations
10.
Blatt, Ruth, Marlys K. Christianson, Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, & Marilynn M. Rosenthal. (2006). A sensemaking lens on reliability. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 27(7). 897–917. 96 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026