This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sexualities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sexualities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sexualities more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Sexualities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sexualities.
About Sexualities
The 1.4k papers published in Sexualities in the last decades have received a total of 23.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Sexualities usually cover Gender Studies (686 papers), Social Psychology (523 papers), Clinical Psychology (435 papers), Sociology and Political Science (832 papers) and Reproductive Medicine (80 papers) specifically the topics of LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (512 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (432 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (410 papers), Sex work and related issues (303 papers), African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (197 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (158 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (131 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sexualities are Feona Attwood, Christian Klesse, Diane Richardson, Kane Race, C. J. Pascoe, Louisa Allen, Virginia Braun, Meg Barker, Rosalind Gill and Phil Hubbard.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.