This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Kantor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Kantor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Kantor more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Kantor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Kantor. The network helps show where Robert Kantor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Kantor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Kantor.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Kantor based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Kantor. Robert Kantor is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lee, Yong‐Won & Robert Kantor. (2015). Investigating Complex Interaction Effects Among Facet Elements in an ESL Writing Test Consisting of Integrated and Independent Tasks. Second language Research. 51(3). 653–678.1 indexed citations
Cumming, Alister, et al.. (2006). Analysis of Discourse Features and Verification of Scoring Levels for Independent and Integrated Prototype Written Tasks for the New TOEFL®. TOEFL® Monograph Series. MS-30. ETS RM-05-13.. ETS Research Report Series.23 indexed citations
6.
Lee, Yong‐Won & Robert Kantor. (2005). Dependability of New ESL Writing Test Scores: Evaluating Prototype Tasks and Alternative Rating Schemes. TOEFL® Monograph Series. MS-31. ETS RR-05-14.. ETS Research Report Series.24 indexed citations
Lee, Yong‐Won, et al.. (2002). Score Dependability of the Writing and Speaking Sections of New TOEFL..11 indexed citations
11.
Lee, Yong‐Won, et al.. (2002). Score Reliability as an Essential Prerequisite for Validating New Writing and Speaking Tasks for TOEFL..5 indexed citations
Kantor, Robert, Thomas H. Anderson, & Bonnie B. Armbruster. (1983). How Inconsiderate are Children's Textbooks?. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 15(1). 61–72.33 indexed citations
Rubin, Andee, Robert Kantor, Alice Davison, et al.. (1981). Conceptual readability : new ways to look at text. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).3 indexed citations
17.
Bruce, Bertram C., Andee Rubin, Veda R. Charrow, et al.. (1981). Text readability : proceedings of the March 1980 conference. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).2 indexed citations
18.
Green, Georgia M., Robert Kantor, Jerry L. Morgan, et al.. (1980). Problems and techniques of text-analysis. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).16 indexed citations
19.
Kantor, Robert. (1977). The management and comprehension of discourse connection by pronouns in English. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network).11 indexed citations
20.
Kantor, Robert. (1976). Discourse Phenomena and Linguistic Theory. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.