Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective
20041.1k citationsJames P. Spillane, Richard Halverson et al.profile →
Investigating School Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective
20011.0k citationsJames P. Spillane, Richard Halverson et al.profile →
Video Games and the Future of Learning
2005622 citationsRichard Halverson et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Halverson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Halverson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Halverson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Halverson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Halverson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Halverson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Halverson. The network helps show where Richard Halverson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Halverson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Halverson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Halverson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Halverson. Richard Halverson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stevens, Reed, Jaakko Hilppö, Kristiina Kumpulainen, et al.. (2018). Exploring the Adoption, Spread, and Sustainability of an Informal STEAM Learning Innovation In Schools. Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja. 2. 1203–1210.4 indexed citations
Shapiro, R. Benjamin, et al.. (2013). Gameplay as Assessment: Analyzing Event-Stream Player Data and Learning Using GBA (A Game-Based Assessment Model).. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. 360–367.1 indexed citations
Halverson, Erica Rosenfeld & Richard Halverson. (2008). Fantasy Baseball. Games and Culture. 3(3-4). 286–308.24 indexed citations
13.
Halverson, Richard, et al.. (2007). The Roles and Practices of Student Services Staff as Data-Driven Instructional Leaders.10 indexed citations
14.
Halverson, Richard, et al.. (2007). Formative Feedback Systems and the New Instructional Leadership.29 indexed citations
15.
Halverson, Richard, David W. Shaffer, Kurt Squire, & Constance Steinkuehler. (2006). Theorizing games in/and education. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 1048–1052.14 indexed citations
16.
Halverson, Richard. (2005). What Can K-12 School Leaders Learn from Video Games and Gaming?.. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University). 1(6). 3.39 indexed citations
17.
Halverson, Richard, et al.. (2005). The New Instructional Leadership: Creating Data-Driven Instructional Systems in Schools. WCER Working Paper No. 2005-9..25 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.