Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers
20013.1k citationsMichael S. Garet, Andrew C. Porter et al.profile →
Effects of Professional Development on Teachers’ Instruction: Results from a Three-year Longitudinal Study
2002913 citationsLaura M. Desimone, Andrew C. Porter et al.profile →
Best Practices in Teachers’ Professional Development in the United States
2015390 citationsLaura M. Desimone, Michael S. Garetprofile →
Experimenting With Teacher Professional Development: Motives and Methods
2008359 citationsAndrew J. Wayne, Pei Zhu et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Michael S. Garet
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael S. Garet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael S. Garet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael S. Garet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael S. Garet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael S. Garet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael S. Garet. The network helps show where Michael S. Garet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael S. Garet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael S. Garet.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael S. Garet based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael S. Garet. Michael S. Garet is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Polikoff, Morgan S., et al.. (2019). Flexibly Using the Surveys of Enacted Curriculum to Study Alignment.. Grantee Submission.1 indexed citations
3.
Wayne, Andrew J., Michael S. Garet, Alison Wellington, & Hanley Chiang. (2018). Promoting Educator Effectiveness: The Effects of Two Key Strategies. NCEE 2018-4009..1 indexed citations
4.
Garet, Michael S., et al.. (2017). The Impact of Providing Performance Feedback to Teachers and Principals. Executive Summary. NCEE 2018-4000..1 indexed citations
5.
Garet, Michael S., Jessica Heppen, Kirk Walters, et al.. (2016). Focusing on Mathematical Knowledge: The Impact of Content-Intensive Teacher Professional Development. NCEE 2016-4010..32 indexed citations
6.
Garet, Michael S., Jessica Heppen, Kirk Walters, et al.. (2016). Focusing on Mathematical Knowledge: The Impact of Content-Intensive Teacher Professional Development. Executive Summary. NCEE 2016-4009..1 indexed citations
7.
Garet, Michael S.. (2016). Focusing on Mathematical Knowledge: The Impact of Content-Intensive Teacher Professional Development.37 indexed citations
8.
Song, Mengli, et al.. (2015). School Practices and Accountability for Students with Disabilities. NCEE 2015-4006..2 indexed citations
9.
Zeiser, Kristina, et al.. (2014). Evidence of Deeper Learning Outcomes. Findings from the Study of Deeper Learning Opportunities and Outcomes: Report 3..3 indexed citations
10.
Turk-Bicakci, Lori, et al.. (2013). Early College, Early Success: Early College High School Initiative Impact Study.. Issue Lab (Candid).48 indexed citations
11.
Song, Mengli, et al.. (2013). The Inclusion of Students with Disabilities in School Accountability Systems: An Update. NCEE 2013-4017..1 indexed citations
12.
Song, Mengli, et al.. (2012). The Inclusion of Students with Disabilities in School Accountability Systems. Interim Report. NCEE 2012-4056..3 indexed citations
13.
Garet, Michael S., Andrew J. Wayne, James Taylor, et al.. (2011). Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study: Findings after the Second Year of Implementation. NCEE 2011-4024..115 indexed citations
14.
Garet, Michael S., Andrew J. Wayne, James Taylor, et al.. (2011). Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study: Findings after the Second Year of Implementation. Executive Summary. NCEE 2011-4025..7 indexed citations
15.
Garet, Michael S., Stephanie Cronen, Marian Eaton, et al.. (2008). The Impact of Two Professional Development Interventions on Early Reading Instruction and Achievement. NCEE 2008-4030..180 indexed citations
16.
Porter, Andrew C., Michael S. Garet, Laura M. Desimone, & Beatrice F. Birman. (2003). Providing Effective Professional Development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program.. Science educator. 12(1). 23–40.101 indexed citations
17.
Birman, Beatrice F., Laura M. Desimone, Andrew C. Porter, & Michael S. Garet. (2000). Designing Professional Development That Works.. Educational leadership. 57(8). 28–33.450 indexed citations
18.
Garet, Michael S., et al.. (1977). Measuring educational progress. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government).5 indexed citations
19.
Cohen, David K. & Michael S. Garet. (1975). Reforming Educational Policy With Applied Research.. Harvard Educational Review.13 indexed citations
20.
Garet, Michael S.. (1974). Educational Policy And System Dynamics.. Journal of research and development in education.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.