Reese Butterfuss

787 total citations
24 papers, 460 citations indexed

About

Reese Butterfuss is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Reese Butterfuss has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 460 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 8 papers in Education and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Reese Butterfuss's work include Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (11 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers). Reese Butterfuss is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (11 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers). Reese Butterfuss collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Reese Butterfuss's co-authors include Panayiota Kendeou, Jasmine Kim, Martin Van Boekel, Kristen L. McMaster, Kathryn S. McCarthy, Gregory Trevors, Edward J. O’Brien, Danielle S. McNamara, Kyle Wagner and Laura K. Allen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Memory & Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Reese Butterfuss

23 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Reese Butterfuss United States 10 275 145 117 112 68 24 460
Anna Potocki France 13 379 1.4× 248 1.7× 87 0.7× 72 0.6× 34 0.5× 28 458
Orly Lipka Israel 12 432 1.6× 238 1.6× 39 0.3× 110 1.0× 20 0.3× 29 614
Joanne Lee Canada 9 225 0.8× 129 0.9× 57 0.5× 73 0.7× 46 0.7× 38 399
Vicky G. Spencer United States 14 319 1.2× 295 2.0× 40 0.3× 119 1.1× 21 0.3× 30 549
Naomi Slonim Canada 4 357 1.3× 164 1.1× 34 0.3× 42 0.4× 15 0.2× 4 483
Nicole Pyle United States 11 262 1.0× 190 1.3× 43 0.4× 51 0.5× 12 0.2× 18 386
Annette Kujawski Taylor United States 9 153 0.6× 198 1.4× 64 0.5× 64 0.6× 47 0.7× 13 389
Vibeke Grøver Aukrust Norway 12 426 1.5× 227 1.6× 36 0.3× 83 0.7× 33 0.5× 19 646
Fataneh Farnia Canada 11 454 1.7× 168 1.2× 24 0.2× 147 1.3× 25 0.4× 15 615
Philip Capin United States 15 398 1.4× 250 1.7× 22 0.2× 56 0.5× 53 0.8× 42 557

Countries citing papers authored by Reese Butterfuss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reese Butterfuss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reese Butterfuss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reese Butterfuss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reese Butterfuss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reese Butterfuss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reese Butterfuss. The network helps show where Reese Butterfuss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Reese Butterfuss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Reese Butterfuss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Reese Butterfuss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Reese Butterfuss. Reese Butterfuss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Johnson, Victoria A., Reese Butterfuss, & Panayiota Kendeou. (2024). Dynamic source credibility and its impacts on knowledge revision. Memory & Cognition. 52(7). 1548–1566. 1 indexed citations
2.
Johnson, Victoria A., et al.. (2024). Patterns of belief and trust in climate change information. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 62(3). 655–683. 6 indexed citations
3.
Butterfuss, Reese, et al.. (2024). An Application of Text Embeddings to Support Alignment of Educational Content Standards. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. 44(1). 73–83. 2 indexed citations
4.
Butterfuss, Reese, et al.. (2023). Identification of main ideas in expository texts: selection versus deletion. Reading and Writing. 37(3). 757–785. 2 indexed citations
5.
McNamara, Danielle S., et al.. (2022). iSTART: Adaptive Comprehension Strategy Training and Stealth Literacy Assessment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 39(11). 2239–2252. 9 indexed citations
6.
Johnson, Victoria A., et al.. (2022). The ‘Fauci Effect’: Reducing COVID-19 misconceptions and vaccine hesitancy using an authentic multimodal intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 70. 102084–102084. 16 indexed citations
7.
Butterfuss, Reese, et al.. (2021). Question Timing, Language Comprehension, and Executive Function in Inferencing. Scientific Studies of Reading. 26(1). 61–78. 5 indexed citations
8.
Butterfuss, Reese. (2021). You Pick'em: Selecting Main Ideas Versus Deleting Details. Proceedings of the 2021 AERA Annual Meeting. 1 indexed citations
9.
Butterfuss, Reese & Panayiota Kendeou. (2021). Correction to: KReC-MD: Knowledge Revision with Multiple Documents. Educational Psychology Review. 34(1). 475–476.
10.
Butterfuss, Reese & Panayiota Kendeou. (2021). KReC-MD: Knowledge Revision with Multiple Documents. Educational Psychology Review. 33(4). 1475–1497. 19 indexed citations
11.
Masón, Lucia, Erika Borella, Irene‐Anna N. Diakidoy, et al.. (2020). Learning From Refutation and Standard Expository Science Texts: The Contribution of Inhibitory Functions in Relation to Text Type. Discourse Processes. 57(10). 921–939. 4 indexed citations
12.
Kendeou, Panayiota, et al.. (2020). The Inferential Language Comprehension (iLC) Framework: Supporting Children's Comprehension of Visual Narratives.. PubMed. 12(1). 256–273. 3 indexed citations
13.
Butterfuss, Reese, et al.. (2020). Hedged Language and Partisan Media Influence Belief in Science Claims. Science Communication. 42(2). 147–171. 10 indexed citations
14.
Kendeou, Panayiota, et al.. (2020). Development and Validation of the Minnesota Inference Assessment. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 47(1). 47–52. 4 indexed citations
15.
Butterfuss, Reese & Panayiota Kendeou. (2019). Reducing interference from misconceptions: The role of inhibition in knowledge revision.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 112(4). 782–794. 27 indexed citations
16.
Kendeou, Panayiota, et al.. (2019). The Inferential Language Comprehension (iLC) Framework: Supporting Children's Comprehension of Visual Narratives. Topics in Cognitive Science. 12(1). 256–273. 30 indexed citations
17.
Kendeou, Panayiota, Reese Butterfuss, Jasmine Kim, & Martin Van Boekel. (2018). Knowledge revision through the lenses of the three-pronged approach. Memory & Cognition. 47(1). 33–46. 71 indexed citations
18.
Butterfuss, Reese & Panayiota Kendeou. (2017). The Role of Executive Functions in Reading Comprehension. Educational Psychology Review. 30(3). 801–826. 171 indexed citations
19.
Trevors, Gregory, Panayiota Kendeou, & Reese Butterfuss. (2017). Emotion Processes in Knowledge Revision. Discourse Processes. 54(5-6). 406–426. 18 indexed citations
20.
Pirlott, Angela G., et al.. (2016). Perceptions of Threats to Physical Safety, Sexual Autonomy, Values, and of Discrimination Drive LGB Prejudices Toward Heterosexuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 42(9). 1147–1163. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026