Countries citing papers authored by Laura K. Allen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura K. Allen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura K. Allen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura K. Allen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura K. Allen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura K. Allen. The network helps show where Laura K. Allen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura K. Allen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura K. Allen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura K. Allen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Laura K. Allen. Laura K. Allen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Allen, Laura K., Aaron D. Likens, & Danielle S. McNamara. (2017). Recurrence Quantification Analysis: A Technique for the Dynamical Analysis of Student Writing.. Grantee Submission. 240–245.3 indexed citations
9.
Crossley, Scott A., Mihai Dascălu, Ștefan Trăușan-Matu, Laura K. Allen, & Danielle S. McNamara. (2016). Document Cohesion Flow: Striving towards Coherence. Cognitive Science.2 indexed citations
10.
Allen, Laura K., Matthew E. Jacovina, Mihai Dascălu, et al.. (2016). {ENTER}ing the Time Series {SPACE}: Uncovering the Writing Process through Keystroke Analyses.. Grantee Submission. 22–29.4 indexed citations
11.
Allen, Laura K., Matthew E. Jacovina, & Danielle S. McNamara. (2016). Cohesive Features of Deep Text Comprehension Processes.. Cognitive Science.12 indexed citations
12.
Allen, Laura K., Caitlin Mills, Matthew E. Jacovina, et al.. (2016). Investigating Boredom and Engagement during Writing Using Multiple Sources of Information: The Essay, the Writer, and Keystrokes.. Grantee Submission.1 indexed citations
Allen, Laura K.. (2015). Who Do You Think I Am? Modeling Individual Differences for More Adaptive and Effective Instruction.. Educational Data Mining. 659–661.1 indexed citations
15.
Allen, Laura K., Erica L. Snow, & Danielle S. McNamara. (2015). Are You Reading My Mind? Modeling Students' Reading Comprehension Skills with Natural Language Processing Techniques.. Grantee Submission.6 indexed citations
16.
Jacovina, Matthew E., Erica L. Snow, Laura K. Allen, et al.. (2015). How to Visualize Success: Presenting Complex Data in a Writing Strategy Tutor.. Educational Data Mining. 594–595.4 indexed citations
17.
Snow, Erica L., Laura K. Allen, G. Tanner Jackson, & Danielle S. McNamara. (2015). Spendency: Students’ Propensity to Use System Currency. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 25(3). 407–427.19 indexed citations
Crossley, Scott A., Kristopher Kyle, Laura K. Allen, Liang Guo, & Danielle S. McNamara. (2014). Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in Automated Writing Evaluation. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 7(1).32 indexed citations
20.
Allen, Laura K., et al.. (2014). The Importance of Grammar and Mechanics in Writing Assessment and Instruction: Evidence from Data Mining.. Grantee Submission.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.