Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language
2004988 citationsArthur C. Graesser, Danielle S. McNamara et al.profile →
Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text
1996920 citationsDanielle S. McNamara et al.profile →
Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix
2014586 citationsDanielle S. McNamara, Arthur C. Graesser et al.profile →
Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence
1996536 citationsDanielle S. McNamara et al.profile →
Coh-Metrix
2011429 citationsArthur C. Graesser, Danielle S. McNamara et al.profile →
Linguistic Features of Writing Quality
2009367 citationsDanielle S. McNamara, Scott A. Crossley et al.profile →
The Multidimensional Knowledge in Text Comprehension framework
202194 citationsDanielle S. McNamara et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle S. McNamara
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle S. McNamara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle S. McNamara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle S. McNamara more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle S. McNamara
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle S. McNamara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle S. McNamara. The network helps show where Danielle S. McNamara may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danielle S. McNamara
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danielle S. McNamara.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danielle S. McNamara based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Danielle S. McNamara. Danielle S. McNamara is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Allen, Laura K., Aaron D. Likens, & Danielle S. McNamara. (2017). Recurrence Quantification Analysis: A Technique for the Dynamical Analysis of Student Writing.. Grantee Submission. 240–245.3 indexed citations
5.
Crossley, Scott A., Tiffany Barnes, Collin Lynch, & Danielle S. McNamara. (2017). Linking Language to Math Success in a Blended Course.. Educational Data Mining.3 indexed citations
6.
Brown, Rebecca, Collin Lynch, Michael Eagle, et al.. (2015). Good Communities and Bad Communities: Does Membership Affect Performance?. Educational Data Mining. 612–613.5 indexed citations
7.
Jackson, G. Tanner, et al.. (2015). Natural Language Processing and Game-Based Practice in iSTART.. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 26(2). 189–208.6 indexed citations
8.
Crossley, Scott A., et al.. (2014). The Importance of Grammar and Mechanics in Writing Assessment and Instruction: Evidence from Data Mining.. Educational Data Mining. 300–303.10 indexed citations
9.
Crossley, Scott A., et al.. (2013). Paragraph specific n-gram approaches to automatically assessing essay quality. Educational Data Mining. 216–219.4 indexed citations
10.
McNamara, Danielle S., Yasuhiro Ozuru, & Randy G. Floyd. (2011). Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers’ prior knowledge. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.98 indexed citations
11.
McNamara, Danielle S. & Panayiota Kendeou. (2011). Translating Advances in Reading Comprehension Research to Educational Practice.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(1). 33–46.31 indexed citations
12.
Crossley, Scott A. & Danielle S. McNamara. (2010). Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing proficiency. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 32(32).87 indexed citations
13.
Moss, Jarrod, Christian D. Schunn, Walter Schneider, Danielle S. McNamara, & Kurt VanLehn. (2010). An fMRI Study of Strategic Reading Comprehension. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 32(32).1 indexed citations
14.
Crossley, Scott A. & Danielle S. McNamara. (2010). Interlanguage talk: What can breadth of knowledge features tell us about input and output differences?. The Florida AI Research Society. 229–234.2 indexed citations
15.
Crossley, Scott A., Max M. Louwerse, & Danielle S. McNamara. (2008). Identifying Linguistic Cues that Distinguish Text Types. 어학연구. 44(2). 361–381.2 indexed citations
McCarthy, Philip M. & Danielle S. McNamara. (2007). Are Seven Words All We Need? Recognizing Genre at the Sub-Sentential Level. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 29(29).4 indexed citations
18.
O’Reilly, Tenaha, et al.. (2004). Reading Strategy Training: Automated Verses Live. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26).2 indexed citations
19.
Hu, Xuemei, Zhiqiang Cai, Donald R. Franceschetti, et al.. (2003). LSA: First dimension and dimensional weighting. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 25(25).1 indexed citations
20.
McNamara, Danielle S., et al.. (2000). IAS volume 198 Cover and Front Matter. Symposium - International Astronomical Union. 198. f1–f11.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.