Phil Smith

945 total citations
29 papers, 320 citations indexed

About

Phil Smith is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Phil Smith has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 320 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 5 papers in Education and 4 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Phil Smith's work include Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers). Phil Smith is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers). Phil Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Phil Smith's co-authors include Jason Walsh, Rhiannon Evans, Rachel Brown, Gwyther Rees, Benjamin Harris, Paul Denny, David A. Harris, Benjamin Harris, Frank Dunstan and Geraint Fuller and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Phil Smith

26 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Phil Smith United Kingdom	9	119	116	56	48	38	29	320
Erin D. Snyder United States	13	175 1.5×	143 1.2×	81 1.4×	86 1.8×	111 2.9×	28	560
Denise Kay United States	9	152 1.3×	130 1.1×	11 0.2×	56 1.2×	57 1.5×	25	373
Pete Van Mullem United States	5	37 0.3×	76 0.7×	24 0.4×	13 0.3×	31 0.8×	12	326
Elizabeth Noble United States	10	67 0.6×	237 2.0×	36 0.6×	41 0.9×	35 0.9×	25	551
Nancy Brigham United States	10	131 1.1×	82 0.7×	21 0.4×	51 1.1×	66 1.7×	18	436
Viktoria Joynes United Kingdom	9	166 1.4×	103 0.9×	11 0.2×	116 2.4×	21 0.6×	12	371
Keith Postlethwaite United Kingdom	11	100 0.8×	233 2.0×	8 0.1×	30 0.6×	11 0.3×	39	460
Judy M. Spak United States	8	183 1.5×	72 0.6×	9 0.2×	119 2.5×	48 1.3×	9	346
Wendy McMillan South Africa	12	91 0.8×	231 2.0×	15 0.3×	65 1.4×	19 0.5×	27	403
Daniel Henry United States	9	64 0.5×	170 1.5×	100 1.8×	14 0.3×	59 1.6×	16	311

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Smith. The network helps show where Phil Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phil Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phil Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phil Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phil Smith. Phil Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Bennett, Verity, Phil Smith, Philip Pallmann, et al.. (2024). Student perspectives on school-based social workers: a mixed-methods study. Journal of Children s Services. 19(3). 189–221.

Westlake, David, Philip Pallmann, Fiona Lugg‐Widger, et al.. (2022). The SWIS trial: Protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of school based social work. PLoS ONE. 17(6). e0265354–e0265354. 2 indexed citations

Mannay, Dawn, et al.. (2021). ‘Becoming more confident in being themselves’: The value of cultural and creative engagement for young people in foster care – Dawn Mannay, Phil Smith, Catt Turney, Stephen Jennings and Peter Davies. Qualitative Social Work. 21(3). 485–503. 5 indexed citations

Stormon, Nicole, et al.. (2018). Evaluation of a community based dental clinic for youth experiencing homelessness in Brisbane. Health & Social Care in the Community. 27(1). 241–248. 7 indexed citations

Smith, Phil, et al.. (2018). BGCI technical review: the economic, social and environmental impacts of botanic gardens.. 2 indexed citations

Walsh, Jason, Benjamin Harris, Paul Denny, & Phil Smith. (2017). Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 94(1108). 97–103. 35 indexed citations

Smith, Phil. (2016). Telephone review for people with epilepsy. Practical Neurology. 16(6). 475–477. 6 indexed citations

Smith, Phil. (2016). Open eyes to sensory testing. Practical Neurology. 17(2). 167–167. 1 indexed citations

Evans, Rhiannon, Rachel Brown, Gwyther Rees, & Phil Smith. (2016). Systematic review of educational interventions for looked‐after children and young people: Recommendations for intervention development and evaluation. British Educational Research Journal. 43(1). 68–94. 60 indexed citations

10.

Harris, Benjamin, et al.. (2015). A Novel Student-Led Approach to Multiple-Choice Question Generation and Online Database Creation, With Targeted Clinician Input. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 27(2). 182–188. 33 indexed citations

11.

Preece, Ryan, et al.. (2015). Peer-assisted teaching of basic surgical skills. Medical Education Online. 20(1). 27579–27579. 43 indexed citations

12.

Walsh, Jason, et al.. (2015). Student‐written single‐best answer questions predict performance in finals. The Clinical Teacher. 13(5). 352–356. 19 indexed citations

13.

Smith, Phil, et al.. (2014). Planning the Journey to Best Practice in Developing Employability Skills: Transnational University Internships in Vietnam.. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 15(2). 145–157. 21 indexed citations

14.

Smith, Phil. (2014). The Potential for Investment in Indonesia’s Geothermal Resource. 2 indexed citations

15.

Glasbey, James, et al.. (2012). 057 Has a pay for performance strategy in primary care improved epilepsy management in the UK?. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 83(3). e1.223–e1. 1 indexed citations

16.

O’Callaghan, Peter, et al.. (2008). The humble electrocardiogram. Practical Neurology. 8(1). 46–59. 7 indexed citations

17.

Smith, Phil. (2005). "There Is No Treatment Here:" Disability and Health Needs In A State Prison System. Disability Studies Quarterly. 25(3).

18.

Smith, Phil, Gordon Fuller, & Frank Dunstan. (2004). Scoring posters at scientific meetings: first impressions count. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 97(7). 340–341. 18 indexed citations

19.

Smith, Phil, et al.. (2002). Using simulated consultations to develop communications skills for neurology trainees*. European Journal of Neurology. 9(1). 83–87. 18 indexed citations

20.

Smith, Phil. (2001). Collaborative Teaching. ADE Bulletin. 60–65. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact