Judy M. Spak

522 total citations
9 papers, 346 citations indexed

About

Judy M. Spak is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Judy M. Spak has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 346 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 6 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Judy M. Spak's work include Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers). Judy M. Spak is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers). Judy M. Spak collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Israel. Judy M. Spak's co-authors include Michael L. Green, Jeremy J. Moeller, Jessica P. Cerdeña, Luisa M. Rivera, Janis Glover, Janet P. Hafler, Michael J. Peluso, Carmi Z. Margolis, Susan van Schalkwyk and David Davies and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and Medical Education.

In The Last Decade

Judy M. Spak

9 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Judy M. Spak United States 8 183 119 72 48 42 9 346
Marianne Mak–van der Vossen Netherlands 13 247 1.3× 135 1.1× 62 0.9× 44 0.9× 70 1.7× 19 365
Fariba Haghani Iran 11 174 1.0× 89 0.7× 150 2.1× 38 0.8× 51 1.2× 46 408
Scott Cottrell United States 12 174 1.0× 103 0.9× 95 1.3× 46 1.0× 31 0.7× 31 383
Julie Youm United States 11 155 0.8× 65 0.5× 80 1.1× 32 0.7× 25 0.6× 28 295
Jonas Nordquist Sweden 12 260 1.4× 170 1.4× 146 2.0× 18 0.4× 50 1.2× 35 486
Olga Kits Canada 10 106 0.6× 111 0.9× 64 0.9× 22 0.5× 15 0.4× 36 303
Jocelyn Schiller United States 11 250 1.4× 92 0.8× 148 2.1× 26 0.5× 64 1.5× 32 433
Rania Zaini Saudi Arabia 7 275 1.5× 90 0.8× 136 1.9× 34 0.7× 34 0.8× 21 379
Amy Fleming United States 13 249 1.4× 86 0.7× 51 0.7× 16 0.3× 64 1.5× 27 357
Agnes E. Dodds Australia 12 180 1.0× 77 0.6× 112 1.6× 48 1.0× 69 1.6× 41 362

Countries citing papers authored by Judy M. Spak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judy M. Spak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judy M. Spak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judy M. Spak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judy M. Spak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judy M. Spak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judy M. Spak. The network helps show where Judy M. Spak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judy M. Spak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judy M. Spak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judy M. Spak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Judy M. Spak. Judy M. Spak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Windish, Donna M., et al.. (2023). State-of-the-art review of medical improvisation curricula to teach health professional learners communication. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 29(3). 1025–1046. 1 indexed citations
3.
Allocco, August, et al.. (2022). The pipeline starts in medical school: characterizing clinician-educator training programs for U.S. medical students. Medical Education Online. 27(1). 2096841–2096841. 7 indexed citations
4.
Cerdeña, Jessica P., Luisa M. Rivera, & Judy M. Spak. (2020). Intergenerational trauma in Latinxs: A scoping review. Social Science & Medicine. 270. 113662–113662. 56 indexed citations
5.
Nicholson, Joey, et al.. (2019). Entrustable professional activity 7: opportunities to collaborate on evidence-based medicine teaching and assessment of medical students. BMC Medical Education. 19(1). 330–330. 10 indexed citations
6.
Nardini, Holly K. Grossetta, Janene Batten, Melissa Funaro, et al.. (2019). Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(1). 23–23. 22 indexed citations
7.
Schalkwyk, Susan van, Janet P. Hafler, Timothy F. Brewer, et al.. (2019). Transformative learning as pedagogy for the health professions: a scoping review. Medical Education. 53(6). 547–558. 140 indexed citations
8.
Green, Michael L., Jeremy J. Moeller, & Judy M. Spak. (2018). Test-enhanced learning in health professions education: A systematic review: BEME Guide No. 48. Medical Teacher. 40(4). 337–350. 80 indexed citations
9.
Spak, Judy M. & Janis Glover. (2007). The Personal Librarian Program: An Evaluation of a Cushing/Whitney Medical Library Outreach Initiative. Medical Reference Services Quarterly. 26(4). 15–25. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026