Pey‐Tee Oon

505 total citations
23 papers, 308 citations indexed

About

Pey‐Tee Oon is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Pey‐Tee Oon has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 308 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Education, 10 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Pey‐Tee Oon's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (11 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (4 papers). Pey‐Tee Oon is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (11 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (4 papers). Pey‐Tee Oon collaborates with scholars based in Macao, Singapore and China. Pey‐Tee Oon's co-authors include R. Subramaniam, Miranda Chi Kuan Mak, Maurice M. W. Cheng, Minghui Li, Lu Yin, Chester Chun Seng Kam, Xitao Fan, Bing Wei, Bi Ying Hu and Huang Fan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Science Education and Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Pey‐Tee Oon

19 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Pey‐Tee Oon Macao 9 205 69 58 50 49 23 308
Elisa Oppermann Germany 11 336 1.6× 62 0.9× 91 1.6× 60 1.2× 70 1.4× 27 446
Laura Betancur United States 10 198 1.0× 47 0.7× 48 0.8× 56 1.1× 70 1.4× 18 350
Jieqiong Fan China 13 169 0.8× 103 1.5× 65 1.1× 76 1.5× 55 1.1× 20 322
Rannveig Grøm Sæle Norway 7 205 1.0× 70 1.0× 56 1.0× 36 0.7× 53 1.1× 11 334
Shane N. Phillipson Australia 10 246 1.2× 78 1.1× 54 0.9× 69 1.4× 76 1.6× 29 363
Rahil Mahyuddin Malaysia 11 249 1.2× 72 1.0× 92 1.6× 119 2.4× 55 1.1× 29 432
Ali Mahdi Kazem Oman 11 182 0.9× 84 1.2× 59 1.0× 42 0.8× 46 0.9× 32 310
Faming Wang Hong Kong 10 123 0.6× 81 1.2× 35 0.6× 133 2.7× 61 1.2× 30 315
Andrea Westphal Germany 10 167 0.8× 64 0.9× 36 0.6× 91 1.8× 70 1.4× 39 328
Petrie J. A. C. van der Zanden Netherlands 4 139 0.7× 65 0.9× 33 0.6× 71 1.4× 68 1.4× 5 272

Countries citing papers authored by Pey‐Tee Oon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pey‐Tee Oon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pey‐Tee Oon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pey‐Tee Oon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pey‐Tee Oon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pey‐Tee Oon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pey‐Tee Oon. The network helps show where Pey‐Tee Oon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pey‐Tee Oon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pey‐Tee Oon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pey‐Tee Oon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pey‐Tee Oon. Pey‐Tee Oon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Oon, Pey‐Tee, et al.. (2026). Promoting undergraduates’ computational thinking in a knowledge building environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 61. 102131–102131.
2.
Oon, Pey‐Tee, et al.. (2024). The transfer effect of computational thinking (CT)-STEM: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education. 11(1). 5 indexed citations
3.
Oon, Pey‐Tee, et al.. (2024). The implementation of engineering design-based STEM learning and its impact on primary students’ scientific creativity. Research in Science & Technological Education. 43(2). 568–588. 5 indexed citations
5.
Oon, Pey‐Tee, et al.. (2024). Unveiling Pre-service Teachers’ Competency and Challenges in Designing 5E Inquiry-based Integrated STEM Lessons: A Quantitative Ethnography Approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 23(6). 1729–1767.
6.
Oon, Pey‐Tee, et al.. (2023). Exploring science pedagogy on the web 2.0/mobile border: Teachers’ views of a mobile wiki-based inquiry approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 19(1). em2218–em2218. 2 indexed citations
7.
Oon, Pey‐Tee, et al.. (2023). Classroom assessment that tailor instruction and direct learning: A validation study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(2). 376–394. 3 indexed citations
8.
Oon, Pey‐Tee, et al.. (2023). Examining the role of metadiscourse in collaborative knowledge building community. Library Hi Tech. 43(1). 132–155. 2 indexed citations
9.
Oon, Pey‐Tee, et al.. (2022). School students’ views about Physics: A cross-national study involving England, Hong Kong and Singapore. Research in Science & Technological Education. 42(3). 784–811.
10.
Mak, Miranda Chi Kuan, et al.. (2020). The Relation between Parenting Stress and Child Behavior Problems: Negative Parenting Styles as Mediator. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 29(11). 2993–3003. 77 indexed citations
11.
Oon, Pey‐Tee, et al.. (2019). Constructs Evaluation of Student Attitudes towards Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 15(12). 7 indexed citations
12.
Oon, Pey‐Tee, Bi Ying Hu, & Bing Wei. (2019). Early childhood educators’ attitudes toward science teaching in Chinese schools. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood. 44(4). 423–435. 11 indexed citations
13.
Oon, Pey‐Tee, et al.. (2019). Gender differences in attitude towards science: methodology for prioritising contributing factors. International Journal of Science Education. 42(1). 89–112. 22 indexed citations
14.
Oon, Pey‐Tee, et al.. (2016). Psychometric quality of a student evaluation of teaching survey in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 42(5). 788–800. 33 indexed citations
15.
Oon, Pey‐Tee & R. Subramaniam. (2014). University Programme Preferences of High School Science Students in Singapore and Reasons that Matter in their Preferences: A Rasch analysis. International Journal of Science Education. 37(2). 367–388. 1 indexed citations
16.
Oon, Pey‐Tee & R. Subramaniam. (2012). Factors Influencing Singapore Students' Choice of Physics as a Tertiary Field of Study: A Rasch analysis. International Journal of Science Education. 35(1). 86–118. 35 indexed citations
17.
Oon, Pey‐Tee & R. Subramaniam. (2010). Views of physics teachers on how to address the declining enrolment in physics at the university level. Research in Science & Technological Education. 28(3). 277–289. 11 indexed citations
18.
Oon, Pey‐Tee & R. Subramaniam. (2010). On the Declining Interest in Physics among Students—From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education. 33(5). 727–746. 48 indexed citations
19.
Oon, Pey‐Tee & R. Subramaniam. (2009). The nature of light: II. A historical survey from the Planck era and implications for budding physicists. Physics Education. 44(4). 392–397. 3 indexed citations
20.
Oon, Pey‐Tee & R. Subramaniam. (2009). The nature of light: I. A historical survey up to the pre-Planck era and implications for teaching. Physics Education. 44(4). 384–391. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026