Countries citing papers authored by Peter McGoldrick
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter McGoldrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter McGoldrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter McGoldrick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter McGoldrick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter McGoldrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter McGoldrick. The network helps show where Peter McGoldrick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter McGoldrick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter McGoldrick.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter McGoldrick based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter McGoldrick. Peter McGoldrick is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Angeli, Antonella De, Kathleen Keeling, & Peter McGoldrick. (2009). Social Interaction with Virtual Beings: The Technology Relationship Interaction Model and Its Agenda for Research. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).3 indexed citations
Keeling, Kathleen & Peter McGoldrick. (2008). Relationships With a Byte? Attraction, Interaction and Intention For Avatar Use on a Retail Website. ACR North American Advances.5 indexed citations
5.
Keeling, Kathleen, Peter McGoldrick, & Susan Beatty. (2007). Virtual onscreen assistants: A viable strategy to support online customer relationship building?. Advances in consumer research. 34. 138–144.6 indexed citations
6.
McGoldrick, Peter, et al.. (2007). High-tech ways to keep cupboards full.. Harvard business review. 85(3). 21–22.13 indexed citations
Keeling, Kathleen, et al.. (2001). TV Home Banking and the Technology Acceptance Model: Intrinsic Motivation and Gender Issues.. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 84–91.1 indexed citations
10.
Keeling, Kathleen, et al.. (2001). Measuring Purchasing Intentions for Internet Retail Sites against Usability Attributes.. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 76–83.7 indexed citations
McGoldrick, Peter. (1998). Antecedents of Spontaneous Buying Behaviour During Temporary Markdowns. Advances in consumer research. 26(1).12 indexed citations
14.
McGoldrick, Peter & Steven J. Greenland. (1996). Comercializacion y venta de Servicios Financieros.. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 102(2). 223–8.1 indexed citations
15.
McGoldrick, Peter, et al.. (1995). International Sourcing: patterns and trends.5 indexed citations
McGoldrick, Peter. (1993). Organisational Culture and the Internationalisation of Retailers. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).13 indexed citations
McGoldrick, Peter & Mark G. Thompson. (1992). Regional shopping centres : out-of-town versus in-town. Avebury eBooks.19 indexed citations
20.
McGoldrick, Peter. (1987). A Multi-dimensional Framework for Retail Pricing. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.