Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen Keeling
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen Keeling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen Keeling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen Keeling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen Keeling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen Keeling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen Keeling. The network helps show where Kathleen Keeling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen Keeling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen Keeling.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen Keeling based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen Keeling. Kathleen Keeling is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Keeling, Kathleen, et al.. (2015). Acceptance of Mobile Apps for Health Self-management: Regulatory Fit Perspective. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).
Gruber, Thorsten, et al.. (2013). A Re-Examination of Value Co-creation in the Age of Interactive Service Robots: A Service Dominant Logic Perspective. Journal of Macromarketing. 33(4). 397–397.2 indexed citations
Keeling, Kathleen & Peter McGoldrick. (2010). Shame, guilt and pride: the role of the moral emotions in marketing pro-environmental behaviour. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).
11.
Angeli, Antonella De, Kathleen Keeling, & Peter McGoldrick. (2009). Social Interaction with Virtual Beings: The Technology Relationship Interaction Model and Its Agenda for Research. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).3 indexed citations
12.
Keeling, Kathleen & Peter McGoldrick. (2008). Relationships With a Byte? Attraction, Interaction and Intention For Avatar Use on a Retail Website. ACR North American Advances.5 indexed citations
13.
Hussin, Ab Razak Che, Linda A. Macaulay, & Kathleen Keeling. (2007). The importance ranking of trust attributes in e-Commerce website. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 99.12 indexed citations
14.
Keeling, Kathleen, Peter McGoldrick, & Susan Beatty. (2007). Virtual onscreen assistants: A viable strategy to support online customer relationship building?. Advances in consumer research. 34. 138–144.6 indexed citations
Newholm, Terry, Peter McGoldrick, Kathleen Keeling, Linda Macaulay, & Joanne Doherty. (2004). Multi-Story Trust and Online Retailer Strategies. The International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research. 14(4). 437–456.22 indexed citations
Keeling, Kathleen, et al.. (2001). Measuring Purchasing Intentions for Internet Retail Sites against Usability Attributes.. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 76–83.7 indexed citations
19.
Keeling, Kathleen, et al.. (2001). TV Home Banking and the Technology Acceptance Model: Intrinsic Motivation and Gender Issues.. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 84–91.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.