Peter H. Wilson
- Education top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Sociology and Political Science
- Family Practice top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kenneth LeithwoodDoris JantziJohn FienSteve ProvostDeborah J. TerryOttmar V. LippDenise ChalmersGerry Farrell
- Topics
- Educational and Psychological Assessments (4 papers)Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers)Evaluation of Teaching Practices (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter H. Wilson
14 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Education 126
- General Health Professions 98
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 85
- Sociology and Political Science 36
- Family Practice 33
Countries citing papers authored by Peter H. Wilson
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter H. Wilson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter H. Wilson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter H. Wilson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter H. Wilson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter H. Wilson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter H. Wilson. The network helps show where Peter H. Wilson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter H. Wilson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter H. Wilson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter H. Wilson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter H. Wilson. Peter H. Wilson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | The role of the scientist-practitioner model in the teaching of psychology: preliminary results from the AUTC funded project Learning Outcomes and Curriculum Development in Psychology | 0 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | The Australian Universities Teaching Committee project in learning outcomes and curriculum development in psychology | 0 |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | Learning outcomes and curriculum development in psychology | 13 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 68 | |
| 16 | 159 | |
| 17 | The Geography Teacher's Guide to the Classroom | 22 |
| 18 | Research in Geographical Education. | 5 |
| 19 | 2 |
About Peter H. Wilson
Peter H. Wilson is a scholar working on General Psychology, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 19 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational and Psychological Assessments (4 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (33 citations), General Psychology (9 citations) and Education (126 citations). Peter H. Wilson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth Leithwood, Doris Jantzi, John Fien, Steve Provost, Deborah J. Terry, Ottmar V. Lipp, Denise Chalmers, Gerry Farrell, Debra Bath and F Martin. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, International Journal of Psychology and Educational Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.