Pauline McAvoy

630 total citations
19 papers, 484 citations indexed

About

Pauline McAvoy is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Information Management and Family Practice. According to data from OpenAlex, Pauline McAvoy has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 484 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 10 papers in Health Information Management and 8 papers in Family Practice. Recurrent topics in Pauline McAvoy's work include Innovations in Medical Education (14 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (10 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (8 papers). Pauline McAvoy is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (14 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (10 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (8 papers). Pauline McAvoy collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Pauline McAvoy's co-authors include Peter McCrorie, Brian Jolly, Lesley Southgate, Richard Hays, Julian Archer, L J M Caldon, I. C. McManus, Jim Cox, Ewan B Macdonald and Neil Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Education, Medical Teacher and BMJ Quality & Safety.

In The Last Decade

Pauline McAvoy

19 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Pauline McAvoy United Kingdom	12	383	205	115	115	74	19	484
Lee Coombes United Kingdom	14	341 0.9×	141 0.7×	84 0.7×	75 0.7×	24 0.3×	25	485
Michel Donoff Canada	10	311 0.8×	172 0.8×	154 1.3×	105 0.9×	41 0.6×	21	392
Catherine M. Welcher United States	6	311 0.8×	116 0.6×	112 1.0×	58 0.5×	40 0.5×	8	373
Alice Z. Frohna United States	8	495 1.3×	173 0.8×	198 1.7×	71 0.6×	16 0.2×	10	597
Hanneke Mulder Netherlands	4	328 0.9×	130 0.6×	126 1.1×	60 0.5×	26 0.4×	9	370
Gordon Page Canada	11	582 1.5×	464 2.3×	117 1.0×	192 1.7×	31 0.4×	15	716
Sankaranarayanan Ramachandran United Kingdom	3	441 1.2×	270 1.3×	129 1.1×	104 0.9×	20 0.3×	3	565
Karlijn Overeem Netherlands	11	560 1.5×	268 1.3×	145 1.3×	157 1.4×	42 0.6×	16	682
T. Robert Vu United States	14	518 1.4×	133 0.6×	214 1.9×	60 0.5×	22 0.3×	25	662
Karen Szauter United States	7	339 0.9×	159 0.8×	144 1.3×	54 0.5×	19 0.3×	19	423

Countries citing papers authored by Pauline McAvoy

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pauline McAvoy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pauline McAvoy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pauline McAvoy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pauline McAvoy

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pauline McAvoy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pauline McAvoy. The network helps show where Pauline McAvoy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pauline McAvoy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pauline McAvoy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pauline McAvoy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pauline McAvoy. Pauline McAvoy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

McAvoy, Pauline, et al.. (2023). Understanding Doctors' Performance. 2 indexed citations

McAvoy, Pauline, et al.. (2014). Defining insight: a challenge that matters. The Clinical Teacher. 11(3). 170–173. 8 indexed citations

Brown, Nick, et al.. (2014). A retrospective study of cognitive function in doctors and dentists with suspected performance problems: an unsuspected but significant concern. JRSM Open. 5(5). 1486362743–1486362743. 11 indexed citations

Donaldson, Liam J., et al.. (2013). Identification of poor performance in a national medical workforce over 11 years: an observational study. BMJ Quality & Safety. 23(2). 147–152. 17 indexed citations

Galbraith, Robert M., Brian Hodges, Pauline McAvoy, et al.. (2012). Expert validation of fit-for-purpose guidelines for designing programmes of assessment. BMC Medical Education. 12(1). 20–20. 45 indexed citations

Archer, Julian & Pauline McAvoy. (2011). Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi‐source feedback. Medical Education. 45(9). 886–893. 29 indexed citations

O’Leary, Denis, et al.. (2010). Performance concerns in psychiatrists referred to the National Clinical Assessment Service. The Psychiatrist. 34(9). 371–375. 1 indexed citations

Crossley, Jim, et al.. (2008). Can a district hospital assess its doctors for re‐licensure?. Medical Education. 42(4). 359–363. 18 indexed citations

McAvoy, Pauline, et al.. (2004). Assessing the competence of practicing physicians in New Zealand, Canada, and the United Kingdom: progress and problems.. PubMed. 36(3). 172–7. 18 indexed citations

10.

Hays, Richard, Brian Jolly, L J M Caldon, et al.. (2002). Is insight important? Measuring capacity to change performance. Medical Education. 36(10). 965–971. 117 indexed citations

11.

Southgate, Lesley, Richard Hays, John J. Norcini, et al.. (2001). Setting performance standards for medical practice: a theoretical framework. Medical Education. 35(5). 474–481. 48 indexed citations

12.

Southgate, Lesley, Jim Cox, Neil Johnson, et al.. (2001). The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace. Medical Education. 35(s1). 9–19. 40 indexed citations

13.

Southgate, Lesley, Jim Cox, Neil Johnson, et al.. (2001). The General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace. Medical Education. 35(s1). 9–19. 10 indexed citations

14.

Southgate, Lesley, Jim Cox, David Hatch, et al.. (2001). The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures. Medical Education. 35(s1). 2–8. 14 indexed citations

15.

Southgate, Lesley, Jim Cox, David Hatch, et al.. (2001). The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures. Medical Education. 35(s1). 2–8. 56 indexed citations

16.

McAvoy, Pauline, Peter McCrorie, Brian Jolly, et al.. (2001). Training the assessors for the General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures. Medical Education. 35(s1). 29–35. 5 indexed citations

17.

McAvoy, Pauline & R C Fraser. (1990). Teaching the teachers at Leicester: the general practice approach. Medical Teacher. 12(1). 33–38. 9 indexed citations

18.

Davis, Wayne K., Peter A.J. Bouhuijs, W. Dale Dauphinée, et al.. (1990). Medical career choice: Current status of research literature. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2(3). 130–138. 34 indexed citations

19.

McAvoy, Pauline, et al.. (1978). Residents evaluate their training in family practice.. PubMed. 24. 487–91. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact