Robert M. Galbraith

4.7k total citations
89 papers, 3.8k citations indexed

About

Robert M. Galbraith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert M. Galbraith has authored 89 papers receiving a total of 3.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Molecular Biology, 18 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 16 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Robert M. Galbraith's work include Vitamin D Research Studies (16 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers). Robert M. Galbraith is often cited by papers focused on Vitamin D Research Studies (16 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers). Robert M. Galbraith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Robert M. Galbraith's co-authors include William M. Lee, David L. Emerson, G.M.P. Galbraith, Franklin H. Epstein, Pascal J. Goldschmidt‐Clermont, André E. Nel, Dave Davis, W. Pagé Faulk, Paul E. Mazmanian and David A. Davis and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet.

In The Last Decade

Robert M. Galbraith

88 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert M. Galbraith United States 33 1.2k 575 532 514 464 89 3.8k
Varda Shalev Israel 42 627 0.5× 633 1.1× 414 0.8× 545 1.1× 920 2.0× 215 6.4k
Burkhard Tönshoff Germany 44 1.0k 0.9× 1.1k 1.9× 484 0.9× 191 0.4× 679 1.5× 244 6.8k
Rebecca M. Minter United States 37 1.8k 1.5× 449 0.8× 316 0.6× 517 1.0× 750 1.6× 154 5.9k
Anna E. Barón United States 58 714 0.6× 3.1k 5.5× 630 1.2× 910 1.8× 1.2k 2.7× 231 12.8k
William C. DeWolf United States 43 606 0.5× 1.7k 3.0× 655 1.2× 729 1.4× 233 0.5× 145 6.0k
Michael S. Broder United States 40 811 0.7× 548 1.0× 465 0.9× 185 0.4× 976 2.1× 248 8.7k
Barbara A. Goff United States 57 986 0.9× 1.4k 2.4× 568 1.1× 296 0.6× 917 2.0× 231 10.2k
Dezheng Huo United States 56 1.1k 1.0× 3.0k 5.3× 518 1.0× 514 1.0× 1.6k 3.5× 284 11.8k
Marc Botteman United States 36 483 0.4× 711 1.2× 265 0.5× 290 0.6× 530 1.1× 212 5.5k
Ann M. Geiger United States 47 1.3k 1.1× 321 0.6× 81 0.2× 198 0.4× 1.1k 2.4× 114 7.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Galbraith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Galbraith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Galbraith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Galbraith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Galbraith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Galbraith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Galbraith. The network helps show where Robert M. Galbraith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert M. Galbraith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert M. Galbraith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert M. Galbraith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert M. Galbraith. Robert M. Galbraith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Wood, Rachael, Emma C. Thomson, Robert M. Galbraith, et al.. (2021). Sharing a household with children and risk of COVID-19: a study of over 300 000 adults living in healthcare worker households in Scotland. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 106(12). 1212–1217. 24 indexed citations
3.
Eva, Kevin W., Georges Bordage, Craig Campbell, et al.. (2015). Towards a program of assessment for health professionals: from training into practice. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 21(4). 897–913. 120 indexed citations
4.
Ellaway, Rachel, Martin Pusic, Robert M. Galbraith, & Terri Cameron. (2014). Developing the role of big data and analytics in health professional education. Medical Teacher. 36(3). 216–222. 126 indexed citations
5.
Galbraith, Robert M., Brian Hodges, Pauline McAvoy, et al.. (2012). Expert validation of fit-for-purpose guidelines for designing programmes of assessment. BMC Medical Education. 12(1). 20–20. 45 indexed citations
6.
Norcini, John J., M. Brownell Anderson, Valdes Roberto Bóllela, et al.. (2011). Criteria for good assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Medical Teacher. 33(3). 206–214. 374 indexed citations
7.
Davis, Dave & Robert M. Galbraith. (2009). Continuing Medical Education Effect on Practice Performance. CHEST Journal. 135(3). 42S–48S. 139 indexed citations
8.
Galbraith, Robert M., Richard E. Hawkins, & Eric S. Holmboe. (2008). Making self-assessment more effective. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 28(1). 20–24. 48 indexed citations
9.
Józefowicz, Ralph F., Bruce M. Koeppen, Susan M. Case, et al.. (2002). The Quality of In-house Medical School Examinations. Academic Medicine. 77(2). 156–161. 137 indexed citations
10.
Galbraith, Robert M., et al.. (2000). A Preliminary Analysis of Different Approaches to Preparing for the USMLE Step 1. Academic Medicine. 75(Supplement). S40–S42. 39 indexed citations
11.
Ambrogi, F, et al.. (1995). Binding of GC (VDBP) to membranes of human B lymphocytes following stripping of extant protein. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 18(8). 630–637. 9 indexed citations
12.
Petrini, Mario, et al.. (1993). Is binding of vitamin D binding protein related to cell differentiation?. Leukemia Research. 17(7). 561–565. 3 indexed citations
13.
Boutin, Bernard, Robert M. Galbraith, & Philippe Arnaúd. (1989). Comparative affinity of the major genetic variants of human group-specific component (vitamin D-binding protein) for 25-(OH) vitamin D3. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry. 32(1). 59–63. 34 indexed citations
14.
Goldschmidt‐Clermont, Pascal J., et al.. (1988). Role of group-specific component (vitamin D binding protein) in clearance of actin from the circulation in the rabbit.. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 81(5). 1519–1527. 43 indexed citations
15.
Galbraith, Robert M., et al.. (1988). Evidence of a novel association of unsaturated fatty acids with Gc (Vitamin D-binding protein). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 153(3). 1019–1024. 55 indexed citations
16.
Lee, William M., et al.. (1987). Antibodies to polymerized human serum albumin in acute and chronic liver disease. Hepatology. 7(5). 906–912. 4 indexed citations
18.
Galbraith, Robert M. & Alistair R. Brown. (1982). Field appraisal with three-dimensional seismic surveys offshore Trinidad. Geophysics. 47(2). 177–195. 4 indexed citations
19.
Galbraith, Robert M., J M Goust, & H. Hugh Fudenberg. (1977). Lymphocyte culture: induction of colonies by conditioned medium from human lymphoid cell lines.. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 146(6). 1821–1826. 9 indexed citations
20.
Galbraith, Robert M., A L Eddleston, M. G. M. Smith, et al.. (1974). Histocompatibility Antigens in Active Chronic Hepatitis and Primary Biliary Cirrhosis. BMJ. 3(5931). 604–605. 84 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026