Ordway Tead
- Sociology and Political Science
- Education
- Information Systems and Management top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Rose K. GoldsenMarver H. BernsteinFrank C. PiersonJames Edwin HowellRobert GordonJoel DeanJohn J. CorsonMelvin T. Copeland
- Topics
- Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers)History of Science and Medicine (1 paper)Religious Education and Schools (1 paper)
- Cited by
- Information Systems and ManagementManagement of Technology and InnovationOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ordway Tead
24 papers receiving 187 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Sociology and Political Science 62
- Education 59
- Information Systems and Management 42
- Social Psychology 39
- Political Science and International Relations 38
Countries citing papers authored by Ordway Tead
This map shows the geographic impact of Ordway Tead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ordway Tead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ordway Tead more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ordway Tead
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ordway Tead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ordway Tead. The network helps show where Ordway Tead may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ordway Tead
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ordway Tead. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ordway Tead based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ordway Tead. Ordway Tead is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Instincts in Industry | 2 |
| 2 | Human Nature and Management: The Applications of Psychology to Executive Leadership | 4 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 117 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 65 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | Administration : its purpose and performance | 1 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | The climate of learning : a constructive attack on complacency in higher education | 1 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | Character building and higher education | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Ordway Tead
Ordway Tead is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Education and Law, having authored 32 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (1 paper) and Religious Education and Schools (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (42 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (29 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (37 citations). Ordway Tead has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Rose K. Goldsen, Marver H. Bernstein, Frank C. Pierson, James Edwin Howell, Robert Gordon, Joel Dean, John J. Corson, Melvin T. Copeland and William H. Newman. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, The Journal of Higher Education and The Educational Forum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.