The Educational Forum

2.0k papers and 18.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in The Educational Forum in the last decades have received a total of 18.0k indexed citations. Papers published in The Educational Forum usually cover Education (881 papers), Sociology and Political Science (257 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (119 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (268 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (108 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Educational Forum are John Dewey, James P. Spillane, Daniel Bell, James A. Banks, Henry A. Giroux, Michael Fullan, John Furlong, Milbrey Wallin McLaughlin, Paul Schiff Berman and Suzanne SooHoo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Educational Forum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Educational Forum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Educational Forum.

Countries where authors publish in The Educational Forum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Educational Forum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Educational Forum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Educational Forum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025