Natalie Freed
-
- Teaching and Learning Programming 6
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 7
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 5
- Usability and User Interface Design 2
-
- Educational Games and Gamification 2
- Education top 10%
- Child Development and Digital Technology 3
-
- Augmented Reality Applications 2
-
- Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence 1
- Co-authors
- Hayes RaffleTia C. MadkinsWinslow BurlesonRafael BallagasJanet GoGlenda RevelleKoichi MoriHiroshi Horii
- Cited by
- Computer Science ApplicationsHuman-Computer InteractionDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Journals
- Sustainability Science (1 paper)IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanPortugal
In The Last Decade
Natalie Freed
13 papers receiving 301 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Computer Science Applications 115
- Human-Computer Interaction 111
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 51
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 9
- Education 94
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Freed
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Freed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Freed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Freed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Freed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Freed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Freed. The network helps show where Natalie Freed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Freed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 48 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 86 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 2 |
About Natalie Freed
Natalie Freed is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Applications and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (7 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (5 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (2 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (2 papers) and Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (115 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (111 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (51 citations). Natalie Freed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Hayes Raffle, Tia C. Madkins, Winslow Burleson, Rafael Ballagas, Janet Go, Glenda Revelle, Koichi Mori, Hiroshi Horii, Kristin Cook and Mirjana Spasojevic. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability Science, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.