Natalie Freed

442 total citations
14 papers, 315 citations indexed

About

Natalie Freed is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Applications and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Freed has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 315 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 6 papers in Computer Science Applications and 4 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Natalie Freed's work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (7 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers) and Interactive and Immersive Displays (5 papers). Natalie Freed is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (7 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers) and Interactive and Immersive Displays (5 papers). Natalie Freed collaborates with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Japan. Natalie Freed's co-authors include Hayes Raffle, Tia C. Madkins, Winslow Burleson, Rafael Ballagas, Koichi Mori, Mirjana Spasojevic, Janet Go, Joseph Kaye, Glenda Revelle and Hiroshi Horii and has published in prestigious journals such as Sustainability Science, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies and PubMed.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Freed

13 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Natalie Freed United States	8	115	111	94	66	51	14	315
Heidi Schelhowe Germany	9	123 1.1×	131 1.2×	87 0.9×	72 1.1×	50 1.0×	38	354
Heléne Gelderblom South Africa	10	86 0.7×	139 1.3×	123 1.3×	91 1.4×	69 1.4×	32	367
Gökçe Elif Baykal Türkiye	10	88 0.8×	153 1.4×	127 1.4×	57 0.9×	67 1.3×	41	338
Junnan Yu Hong Kong	9	134 1.2×	67 0.6×	112 1.2×	46 0.7×	57 1.1×	30	286
Kate Howland United Kingdom	11	155 1.3×	73 0.7×	109 1.2×	77 1.2×	163 3.2×	41	384
Pablo A. Haya Spain	11	80 0.7×	52 0.5×	98 1.0×	72 1.1×	79 1.5×	41	310
Hilary Smith United Kingdom	12	56 0.5×	167 1.5×	116 1.2×	129 2.0×	125 2.5×	24	445
Ricarose Roque United States	11	234 2.0×	76 0.7×	171 1.8×	79 1.2×	138 2.7×	40	427
Andrea Marshall United States	7	91 0.8×	118 1.1×	26 0.3×	32 0.5×	18 0.4×	9	275
Salvador Otón Spain	12	146 1.3×	46 0.4×	135 1.4×	161 2.4×	90 1.8×	64	505

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Freed

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Freed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Freed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Freed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Freed

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Freed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Freed. The network helps show where Natalie Freed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Freed

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Freed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Freed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Freed. Natalie Freed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Freed, Natalie, et al.. (2021). PlushPal: Storytelling with Interactive Plush Toys and Machine Learning. Interaction Design and Children. 236–245. 35 indexed citations

2.

Qi, Jie, et al.. (2021). Exquisite Circuits: Collaborative Electronics Design through Drawing Games. Creativity and Cognition. 1–14.

3.

Madkins, Tia C., et al.. (2020). Engaging Equity Pedagogies in Computer Science Learning Environments. PubMed. 3(2). 1–27. 45 indexed citations

4.

Pennington, Deana, Imme Ebert‐Uphoff, Natalie Freed, Jo Martin, & Suzanne A. Pierce. (2019). Bridging sustainability science, earth science, and data science through interdisciplinary education. Sustainability Science. 15(2). 647–661. 21 indexed citations

5.

Burleson, Winslow, et al.. (2017). Active Learning Environments with Robotic Tangibles: Children's Physical and Virtual Spatial Programming Experiences. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 11(1). 96–106. 48 indexed citations

6.

Zagalo, Nelson, et al.. (2013). Bridging books. RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho). 606–609. 3 indexed citations

7.

Freed, Natalie, Jie Qi, Cristina Sylla, & Pedro Branco. (2011). Beyond the binding. RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho). 445–446. 7 indexed citations

8.

Raffle, Hayes, Glenda Revelle, Koichi Mori, et al.. (2011). Hello, is grandma there? let's read! StoryVisit. 1195–1204. 86 indexed citations

9.

Freed, Natalie, et al.. (2011). Sticking together. 238–241. 31 indexed citations

10.

Freed, Natalie, et al.. (2010). User interfaces for tangible characters. 69–78. 16 indexed citations

11.

Freed, Natalie. (2010). Toys keeping in touch. 315–316. 5 indexed citations

12.

Freed, Natalie, et al.. (2009). Human-robot interactions to promote play and learning. 280–281. 2 indexed citations

13.

Speyer, Gil, et al.. (2008). Paradigms for Parallel Computation. 486–494. 2 indexed citations

14.

Burleson, Winslow, et al.. (2008). Integrating video games and robotic play in physical environments. 107–114. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact