Natalie Förster

41 total papers · 805 total citations
29 papers, 522 citations indexed

About

Natalie Förster is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Förster has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 522 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Education, 12 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 9 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Natalie Förster's work include Reading and Literacy Development (11 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (9 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers). Natalie Förster is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (11 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (9 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers). Natalie Förster collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Luxembourg and Austria. Natalie Förster's co-authors include Elmar Souvignier, Boris Forthmann, Johanna Kaiser, Andreas Hetmanek, Karina Karst, Anna‐Katharina Praetorius, Matthias Böhmer, Detlev Leutner, Stefan Ufer and Constance Karing and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Teaching and Teacher Education and Learning and Instruction.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Förster

28 papers receiving 502 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Natalie Förster 342 225 108 85 61 29 522
Marjolein Deunk 330 1.0× 159 0.7× 46 0.4× 36 0.4× 30 0.5× 30 463
Bettina Rösken-Winter 494 1.4× 134 0.6× 53 0.5× 61 0.7× 36 0.6× 25 585
Melissa A. Gallagher 318 0.9× 158 0.7× 36 0.3× 36 0.4× 33 0.5× 31 451
H. Broekkamp 399 1.2× 259 1.2× 62 0.6× 74 0.9× 30 0.5× 21 574
Armin Jentsch 440 1.3× 71 0.3× 51 0.5× 45 0.5× 71 1.2× 29 524
Jenny Lenkeit 416 1.2× 90 0.4× 59 0.5× 37 0.4× 34 0.6× 24 544
Jennifer Randall 402 1.2× 90 0.4× 55 0.5× 43 0.5× 52 0.9× 37 612
Svenja Rieser 494 1.4× 135 0.6× 63 0.6× 108 1.3× 143 2.3× 14 614
Teomara Rutherford 306 0.9× 230 1.0× 25 0.2× 91 1.1× 79 1.3× 47 543
Allison Ward Parsons 424 1.2× 185 0.8× 28 0.3× 41 0.5× 49 0.8× 23 542

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Förster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Förster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Förster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Förster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Förster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Förster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Förster. The network helps show where Natalie Förster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Förster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Förster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Förster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Förster. Natalie Förster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026