M.T. Nickerson

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

M.T. Nickerson is a scholar working on Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, M.T. Nickerson has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Food Science, 3 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics and 2 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in M.T. Nickerson's work include Proteins in Food Systems (4 papers), Food composition and properties (3 papers) and Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (2 papers). M.T. Nickerson is often cited by papers focused on Proteins in Food Systems (4 papers), Food composition and properties (3 papers) and Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (2 papers). M.T. Nickerson collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Australia and Spain. M.T. Nickerson's co-authors include Robert T. Tyler, Aslı Can Karaça, Nicholas H. Low, Cristina Martı́nez-Villaluenga, Albert Vandenberg, Maya Subedi, Hamid Khazaeı, Juana Frı́as, Andrea K. Stone and Yang Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as Food Chemistry, Food Research International and Foods.

In The Last Decade

M.T. Nickerson

7 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Pea protein isolates: Structure, extraction, and functionality

2016 654 citations Aslı Can Karaça, Robert T. Tyler et al. Food Reviews International profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M.T. Nickerson Canada	6	803	287	265	189	189	7	1.1k
Bartosz G. Sołowiej Poland	19	777 1.0×	342 1.2×	183 0.7×	246 1.3×	259 1.4×	90	1.2k
Dilek Ercili-Cura Finland	19	778 1.0×	246 0.9×	205 0.8×	333 1.8×	165 0.9×	23	1.1k
Jiao Ge China	9	557 0.7×	227 0.8×	138 0.5×	159 0.8×	152 0.8×	10	773
Linyi Zhou China	16	982 1.2×	347 1.2×	169 0.6×	284 1.5×	252 1.3×	36	1.3k
Inge Celus Belgium	10	387 0.5×	328 1.1×	245 0.9×	237 1.3×	124 0.7×	14	846
Marcela Jarpa–Parra Chile	8	703 0.9×	275 1.0×	228 0.9×	179 0.9×	110 0.6×	14	847
İlyas Atalar Türkiye	17	892 1.1×	310 1.1×	123 0.5×	192 1.0×	185 1.0×	54	1.1k
Oni Yuliarti Singapore	17	605 0.8×	207 0.7×	422 1.6×	79 0.4×	128 0.7×	31	840
Alfonso Totosaus Mexico	20	991 1.2×	379 1.3×	140 0.5×	256 1.4×	533 2.8×	61	1.4k
Mingming Qi China	15	802 1.0×	407 1.4×	337 1.3×	450 2.4×	213 1.1×	43	1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by M.T. Nickerson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.T. Nickerson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.T. Nickerson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.T. Nickerson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.T. Nickerson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.T. Nickerson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.T. Nickerson. The network helps show where M.T. Nickerson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.T. Nickerson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.T. Nickerson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.T. Nickerson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.T. Nickerson. M.T. Nickerson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Khazaeı, Hamid, Maya Subedi, M.T. Nickerson, et al.. (2019). Seed Protein of Lentils: Current Status, Progress, and Food Applications. Foods. 8(9). 391–391. 179 indexed citations

2.

Guillermic, Reine‐Marie, Filiz Köksel, Xinyang Sun, et al.. (2017). Bubbles in noodle dough: Characterization by X-ray microtomography. Food Research International. 105. 548–555. 18 indexed citations

3.

Wood, Jennifer A., Joe Panozzo, Clifford Hall, et al.. (2017). AACCI Approved Methods Technical Committee Report: Collaborative Study on a Method for Determining the Water Holding Capacity of Pulse Flours and Their Protein Materials (AACCI Method 56-37.01). Cereal Foods World. 62(5). 227–230. 4 indexed citations

4.

Karaça, Aslı Can, et al.. (2016). Pea protein isolates: Structure, extraction, and functionality. Food Reviews International. 34(2). 126–147. 654 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Stone, Andrea K., et al.. (2011). Complex coacervation of pea protein isolate and alginate polysaccharides. Food Chemistry. 130(3). 710–715. 152 indexed citations

6.

Low, Nicholas H., et al.. (2010). In vitro characterization of probiotic survival, adherence and antimicrobial resistance: candidate selection for encapsulation in a pea protein isolatealginate delivery system.. 5(1). 1–12. 9 indexed citations

7.

Liu, Yang, A.T. Paulson, & M.T. Nickerson. (2010). Mechanical and physical properties of calcium-treated gellan films. Food Research International. 43(5). 1439–1443. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact