Moty Amar
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Marketing top 10%
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Aner TalYaniv GviliGuy ItzchakovDan ArielyNetta WeinsteinShahar AyalCynthia CryderScott Rick
- Topics
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyJournal of Marketing ResearchJournal of Consumer Research
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Moty Amar
22 papers receiving 369 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Social Psychology 136
- Sociology and Political Science 104
- Marketing 102
- General Decision Sciences 73
- Applied Psychology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Moty Amar
This map shows the geographic impact of Moty Amar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moty Amar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moty Amar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Moty Amar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moty Amar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moty Amar. The network helps show where Moty Amar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Moty Amar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Moty Amar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Moty Amar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Moty Amar. Moty Amar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | All the Right Moves: Why Motion Increases Appeal of Food Products | 1 |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 92 | |
| 19 | 36 | |
| 20 | Wishful Thinking in Predicting World Cup Results: Still Elusive | 4 |
About Moty Amar
Moty Amar is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Sensory Systems and Applied Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (73 citations), Applied Psychology (60 citations) and Marketing (102 citations). Moty Amar has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Aner Tal, Yaniv Gvili, Guy Itzchakov, Dan Ariely, Netta Weinstein, Shahar Ayal, Cynthia Cryder, Scott Rick, Maya Bar‐Hillel and Brian Wansink. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Marketing Research and Journal of Consumer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.