Ofir Ben‐Assuli

1.6k citations
62 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Ofir Ben‐Assuli

58 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Ofir Ben‐Assuli
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Health Information Management 352
  • Health Informatics 35
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 15
  • Family Practice 17
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 11
Replace Kim M. Unertl with:
Kim M. Unertl United States
Robert S. Rudin United States
Farahnaz Sadoughi Iran
Jürgen Stausberg Germany
Titus Schleyer United States
Liz Wing United States
Thomas Bürkle Germany
Ruben Amarasingham United States
Chantal Worzala United States
John F. Hurdle United States
Ofir Ben‐Assuli relative to Kim M. Unertl United States Kim M. Unertl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Kim M. Unertl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ofir Ben‐Assuli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ofir Ben‐Assuli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ofir Ben‐Assuli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ofir Ben‐Assuli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ofir Ben‐Assuli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ofir Ben‐Assuli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ofir Ben‐Assuli. The network helps show where Ofir Ben‐Assuli may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ofir Ben‐Assuli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ofir Ben‐Assuli Line = papers co-authored together Ofir Ben‐Assuli links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016161
2 2014112
3 201359
4 201354
5 201544
6 201942
7 202041
8 201840
9 201739
10 202036
11 201235
12 201429
13 202325
14 201422
15 201522
16 202220
17 201318
18 202118
19 202114
20 201913

About Ofir Ben‐Assuli

Ofir Ben‐Assuli is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Artificial Intelligence, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (15 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (11 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (11 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (7 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (7 papers), Data Quality and Management (6 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (6 papers) and Medical Coding and Health Information (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (352 citations), Health Informatics (35 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (15 citations), Family Practice (17 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (11 citations). Ofir Ben‐Assuli has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Itamar Shabtai, Moshe Leshno, Tsipi Heart, Rema Padman, Joshua R. Vest, Shira Zelber‐Sagi, Yakov Flaumenhaft, Ronit Endevelt, Robert Klempfner and Amitai Ziv. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Health Policy and Technology, Information Systems Management and Journal of Medical Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact