Danit Ein‐Gar

619 total citations
23 papers, 438 citations indexed

About

Danit Ein‐Gar is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Danit Ein‐Gar has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 438 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Applied Psychology, 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Danit Ein‐Gar's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (14 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers). Danit Ein‐Gar is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (14 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers). Danit Ein‐Gar collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and Hong Kong. Danit Ein‐Gar's co-authors include Liat Levontin, Baba Shiv, Zakary L. Tormala, Lilach Sagiv, Yael Steinhart, Angela Y. Lee, Jacob Goldenberg, Adi Amit, Sharon Arieli and Catherine A. Heaney and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Consumer Research and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Danit Ein‐Gar

21 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Danit Ein‐Gar Israel 11 205 150 133 117 55 23 438
Rod Duclos United States 7 160 0.8× 135 0.9× 84 0.6× 176 1.5× 34 0.6× 14 413
Mirjam Tuk Netherlands 10 179 0.9× 122 0.8× 78 0.6× 56 0.5× 70 1.3× 21 355
Leilei Gao Hong Kong 8 161 0.8× 277 1.8× 102 0.8× 108 0.9× 36 0.7× 14 439
Szu‐chi Huang United States 15 245 1.2× 219 1.5× 273 2.1× 168 1.4× 69 1.3× 32 629
Daniella Kupor United States 13 231 1.1× 171 1.1× 62 0.5× 110 0.9× 54 1.0× 30 490
Rebecca Hamilton United States 10 169 0.8× 225 1.5× 77 0.6× 140 1.2× 74 1.3× 15 467
Lily Jampol United States 4 157 0.8× 183 1.2× 53 0.4× 149 1.3× 59 1.1× 9 406
Elanor F. Williams United States 10 118 0.6× 99 0.7× 76 0.6× 80 0.7× 38 0.7× 20 313
Lalin Anik United States 8 217 1.1× 77 0.5× 75 0.6× 93 0.8× 33 0.6× 16 394
Tamar Avnet United States 8 177 0.9× 225 1.5× 207 1.6× 101 0.9× 54 1.0× 19 446

Countries citing papers authored by Danit Ein‐Gar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danit Ein‐Gar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danit Ein‐Gar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danit Ein‐Gar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danit Ein‐Gar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danit Ein‐Gar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danit Ein‐Gar. The network helps show where Danit Ein‐Gar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danit Ein‐Gar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danit Ein‐Gar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danit Ein‐Gar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Danit Ein‐Gar. Danit Ein‐Gar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ein‐Gar, Danit, et al.. (2024). Prosocial behaviour enhances evaluation of physical beauty. British Journal of Social Psychology. 64(2). e12800–e12800.
2.
Ein‐Gar, Danit & Amir Give’on. (2022). The Influence of Proportion Dominance and Global Need Perception on Donations. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 800867–800867.
3.
Bareket, Orly, Danit Ein‐Gar, & Tehila Kogut. (2022). I will help you survive but not thrive: Helping decisions in situations that empower women. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 26(7). 1641–1659. 3 indexed citations
4.
Ma, Jingjing, et al.. (2022). Charitable maximizers: The impact of the maximizing mindset on donations to human recipients. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 40(2). 417–434. 9 indexed citations
5.
Ein‐Gar, Danit, et al.. (2019). The “Commitment Projection” Effect: When Multiple Payments for a Product Affect Defection from a Service. Journal of Marketing Research. 56(5). 842–861. 3 indexed citations
6.
Ein‐Gar, Danit, Liat Levontin, & Tehila Kogut. (2018). The “Opt-Out” Effect: When the Need to Choose Decreases Donations. ACR European Advances. 1 indexed citations
7.
Ein‐Gar, Danit & Yael Steinhart. (2017). Self-control and Task Timing Shift Self-efficacy and Influence Willingness to Engage in Effortful Tasks. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 1788–1788. 19 indexed citations
8.
Ein‐Gar, Danit & Lilach Sagiv. (2014). Overriding “Doing Wrong” and “Not Doing Right”: Validation of the Dispositional Self-Control Scale (DSC). Journal of Personality Assessment. 96(6). 640–653. 12 indexed citations
9.
Toker, Sharon, Catherine A. Heaney, & Danit Ein‐Gar. (2014). Why won’t they participate? Barriers to participation in worksite health promotion programmes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 24(6). 866–881. 19 indexed citations
10.
Levontin, Liat, Danit Ein‐Gar, & Angela Y. Lee. (2014). Acts of emptying promote self‐focus: A perceived resource deficiency perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 25(2). 257–267. 48 indexed citations
11.
Ein‐Gar, Danit. (2014). Committing under the shadow of tomorrow: Self‐control and commitment to future virtuous behaviors. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 25(2). 268–285. 17 indexed citations
12.
Sagiv, Lilach, Adi Amit, Danit Ein‐Gar, & Sharon Arieli. (2013). Not All Great Minds Think Alike: Systematic and Intuitive Cognitive Styles. Journal of Personality. 82(5). 402–417. 27 indexed citations
13.
Ein‐Gar, Danit & Liat Levontin. (2012). Giving from a distance: Putting the charitable organization at the center of the donation appeal. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 23(2). 197–211. 121 indexed citations
14.
Ein‐Gar, Danit, Jacob Goldenberg, & Lilach Sagiv. (2012). The role of consumer self-control in the consumption of virtue products. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 29(2). 123–133. 21 indexed citations
15.
Ein‐Gar, Danit, Baba Shiv, & Zakary L. Tormala. (2012). When Blemishing Leads to Blossoming: The Positive Effect of Negative Information. Journal of Consumer Research. 38(5). 846–859. 84 indexed citations
16.
Ein‐Gar, Danit & Camille S. Johnson. (2010). Being Indulgent and Becoming Prudent. ACR North American Advances. 2 indexed citations
17.
Ein‐Gar, Danit & Yael Steinhart. (2010). The “Sprinter effect”: When self‐control and involvement stand in the way of sequential performance. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 21(3). 240–255. 20 indexed citations
18.
Ein‐Gar, Danit & Yael Steinhart. (2009). The Sprinter Effect: When Involvement and Self-Control Fail to Overcome Ego-Depletion. ACR North American Advances. 1 indexed citations
19.
Johnson, Camille S. & Danit Ein‐Gar. (2008). Being Hedonic and Becoming Prudent. ACR North American Advances. 5 indexed citations
20.
Ein‐Gar, Danit, Jacob Goldenberg, & Lilach Sagiv. (2008). Taking Control: An Integrated Model of Dispositional Self-Control and Measure. SSRN Electronic Journal. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rod Duclos Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mirjam Tuk Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leilei Gao Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Szu‐chi Huang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniella Kupor Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca Hamilton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lily Jampol Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elanor F. Williams Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lalin Anik Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tamar Avnet
Rankless by CCL
2026