Morag Gray

1.7k citations
44 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Morag Gray

42 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Morag Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Research and Theory 283
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 46
  • Leadership and Management 41
  • Family Practice 64
  • Education 582
Replace Elisabeth Carlson with:
Elisabeth Carlson Sweden
Diane M. Billings United States
Di Marks‐Maran United Kingdom
Håkan Hult Sweden
Shwu‐Ru Liou Taiwan
Patrick A Crookes Australia
Zohreh Vanaki Iran
Nancy Diekelmann United States
Anna‐Maria Tuomikoski Finland
Jean Giddens United States
Morag Gray relative to Elisabeth Carlson Sweden Elisabeth Carlson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Elisabeth Carlson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Morag Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Morag Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Morag Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Morag Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Morag Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Morag Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Morag Gray. The network helps show where Morag Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Morag Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Morag Gray Line = papers co-authored together Morag Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003364
2 2000206
3 1999106
4 200469
5 200360
6 201251
7 200447
8 201845
9 200836
10 200230
11 201423
12 199922
13
Leadership in compassionate care programme: final report.
201221
14 201820
15
Evaluation of Nurse Education Partnership
200416
16 201615
17 200111
18 19989
19 20168
20 19988

About Morag Gray

Morag Gray is a scholar working on Education, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Research and Theory and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (11 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (6 papers), Nursing education and management (5 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Higher Education Practises and Engagement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (283 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (46 citations), Leadership and Management (41 citations), Family Practice (64 citations) and Education (582 citations). Morag Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Lorraine N. Smith, Ruth Endacott, Mirjam McMullan, Melanie Jasper, Christine Webb, Julie Scholes, Carolyn Miller, Jayne Donaldson, Iddo Oberski and Dorothy Horsburgh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nurse Researcher, Nurse Education in Practice, Nurse Education Today and Journal of research in nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact