D. G. Smith
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Equine top 1%
- Genetics
- Small Animals top 5%
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- R. A. PearsonJ.G. RaatsG. FesehaR.W. MayesE. Gordon YoungD. CuddefordGeoff HodgsonDon McFarlane
- Topics
- Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (10 papers)Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (8 papers)Veterinary Equine Medical Research (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexicoEthiopia
In The Last Decade
D. G. Smith
25 papers receiving 374 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Agronomy and Crop Science 140
- Equine 113
- Genetics 105
- Small Animals 82
- Ecology 68
Countries citing papers authored by D. G. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of D. G. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. G. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. G. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. G. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. G. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. G. Smith. The network helps show where D. G. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. G. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. G. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. G. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. G. Smith. D. G. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | Climate change, water and conflict in the Niger River Basin | 14 |
| 5 | Integrated metro and access network: PIEMAN (invited paper). | 8 |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | Improving the survival of donkey foals through improved nutrition and anthelmintic treatment of their dams. | 0 |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | The impact of grazing time allowance on the dry matter intake and foraging behaviour of cattle and donkeys managed under traditional African grazing systems. PhD thesis. University of Edinburgh, UK. 291 pp. | 3 |
| 19 | A comparison of the energy requirements for work in donkeys, ponies and cattle. | 2 |
| 20 | 19 |
About D. G. Smith
D. G. Smith is a scholar working on Equine, Agronomy and Crop Science and Research and Theory, having authored 27 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (10 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (8 papers) and Veterinary Equine Medical Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (113 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (140 citations) and Small Animals (82 citations). D. G. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include R. A. Pearson, J.G. Raats, G. Feseha, R.W. Mayes, E. Gordon Young, D. Cuddeford, Geoff Hodgson, Don McFarlane, Domingo Zarzo and Morag Gray. Their work appears in journals such as Desalination, Nurse Education Today and The Journal of Agricultural Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.