Dorothy Horsburgh
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Education top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Michael BrownThanos KaratziasAnne RowatMorag GrayAnne WaughD. G. SmithMartin DennisMaggie Lawrence
- Topics
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers)Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers)Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dorothy Horsburgh
16 papers receiving 466 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- General Health Professions 167
- Clinical Psychology 116
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 99
- Education 84
- Sociology and Political Science 75
Countries citing papers authored by Dorothy Horsburgh
This map shows the geographic impact of Dorothy Horsburgh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorothy Horsburgh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorothy Horsburgh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dorothy Horsburgh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorothy Horsburgh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorothy Horsburgh. The network helps show where Dorothy Horsburgh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dorothy Horsburgh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dorothy Horsburgh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dorothy Horsburgh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dorothy Horsburgh. Dorothy Horsburgh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 74 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | Leadership in compassionate care programme: final report. | 21 |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 45 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 244 | |
| 16 | The ethical implications and legal aspects of patient restraint. | 2 |
About Dorothy Horsburgh
Dorothy Horsburgh is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Research and Theory and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 16 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (33 citations), General Health Professions (167 citations) and Leadership and Management (7 citations). Dorothy Horsburgh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Brown, Thanos Karatzias, Anne Rowat, Morag Gray, Anne Waugh, D. G. Smith, Martin Dennis, Maggie Lawrence, Lynn Legg and Lorraine N. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Neurosciences, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Postgraduate Medical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.