Monica Sweet
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Academic integrity and plagiarism 2
-
- Reading and Literacy Development 3
- Child and Animal Learning Development 3
- Education top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 3
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 3
-
- Face Recognition and Perception 2
-
- Teaching and Learning Programming 2
-
- Cultural Differences and Values 2
- Co-authors
- Mark I. AppelbaumGail D. HeymanKang LeeGabriela Simon‐CereijidoVera F. Gutiérrez‐ClellenLeslie J. CarverMargaret M. SwinglerDena Plemmons
- Journals
- Child Development (1 paper)Developmental Psychology (1 paper)Educational Researcher (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaChina
In The Last Decade
Monica Sweet
16 papers receiving 737 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Clinical Psychology 439
- Safety Research 116
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 164
- Education 189
- General Health Professions 160
Countries citing papers authored by Monica Sweet
This map shows the geographic impact of Monica Sweet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monica Sweet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monica Sweet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Monica Sweet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monica Sweet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monica Sweet. The network helps show where Monica Sweet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Monica Sweet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 50 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 73 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 16 | Is Home Visiting an Effective Strategy? A Meta-Analytic Review of Home Visiting Programs for Families With Young Childrenbreakdown → | 2004 | 576 |
| 17 | 1996 | 1 |
About Monica Sweet
Monica Sweet is a scholar working on Safety Research, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Science Applications, having authored 17 papers that have together received 814 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Academic integrity and plagiarism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (439 citations), Safety Research (116 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (164 citations). Monica Sweet has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Mark I. Appelbaum, Gail D. Heyman, Kang Lee, Gabriela Simon‐Cereijido, Vera F. Gutiérrez‐Clellen, Leslie J. Carver, Margaret M. Swingler, Dena Plemmons, Genyue Fu and Michael Kalichman. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Developmental Psychology and Educational Researcher.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.