Dena Plemmons

26 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Dena Plemmons
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Safety Research 175
  • Health Informatics 28
  • Information Systems and Management 96
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 173
  • Clinical Psychology 172
Replace Ronald W. Belter with:
Ronald W. Belter United States
Agnes G. Rezler United States
Thelma Simões Matsukura Brazil
Sarah Vejnoska United States
Sofia Santos Portugal
Melissa Clements United States
Katherine Dix Australia
Natalie Douglas United States
Courtney A. Rocheleau United States
Gabriela A. Nagy United States
Dena Plemmons relative to Ronald W. Belter United States Ronald W. Belter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Ronald W. Belter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dena Plemmons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dena Plemmons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dena Plemmons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dena Plemmons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dena Plemmons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dena Plemmons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dena Plemmons. The network helps show where Dena Plemmons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dena Plemmons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dena Plemmons Line = papers co-authored together Dena Plemmons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004139
2 200780
3 200779
4 200678
5 200660
6 201718
7 201318
8 202016
9 201415
10 200215
11 201511
12 200710
13 20139
14 20179
15 20148
16 20128
17 20076
18 20115
19 20145
20 20213

About Dena Plemmons

Dena Plemmons is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management, Safety Research and Clinical Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic integrity and plagiarism (7 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (7 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers), Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers) and Community Health and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (175 citations), Health Informatics (28 citations), Information Systems and Management (96 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (173 citations) and Clinical Psychology (172 citations). Dena Plemmons has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Tunisia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Michael Kalichman, Laurel K. Leslie, John Landsverk, Jill Weckerly, Suzanne A. Brody, Ann F. Garland, Lawrence A. Palinkas, Amy R. Monn, Monica Sweet and Stuart Henry. Their work appears in journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics and Academic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact