Milo Shaoqing Wang

19 papers receiving 751 citations

Hit Papers

Topic Modeling in Management Research: Rendering New Theo...201920262021202320192021100200300

Peers

Milo Shaoqing Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Sociology and Political Science 265
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 225
  • Strategy and Management 191
  • Management Information Systems 84
  • Marketing 81
Replace Amanda Sharkey with:
Amanda Sharkey United States
Mirjam Werner Netherlands
Fernando Martín Alcázar Spain
Saša Batistič Netherlands
Jeppe Agger Nielsen Denmark
Wendy S. Harman United States
K C Patrick Low Australia
Rómulo Pinheiro Norway
Özgecan Koçak United States
Marion Büttgen Germany
Milo Shaoqing Wang relative to Amanda Sharkey United States Amanda Sharkey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Amanda Sharkey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Milo Shaoqing Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Milo Shaoqing Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Milo Shaoqing Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Milo Shaoqing Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Milo Shaoqing Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Milo Shaoqing Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Milo Shaoqing Wang. The network helps show where Milo Shaoqing Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Milo Shaoqing Wang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Milo Shaoqing Wang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Milo Shaoqing Wang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Milo Shaoqing Wang. Milo Shaoqing Wang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 0
3 4
4 0
5 3
6 4
7 7
8 1
9 11
10
New Directions in the Study of Institutional Logics: From Tools to Phenomenabreakdown →
111
11 112
12 46
13 1
14 3
15 30
16 0
17
Topic Modeling in Management Research: Rendering New Theory from Textual Databreakdown →
391
18 7
19 2
20 35

About Milo Shaoqing Wang

Milo Shaoqing Wang is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Social Sciences and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 779 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (8 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (3 papers) and Corruption and Economic Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (225 citations), General Social Sciences (62 citations) and Strategy and Management (191 citations). Milo Shaoqing Wang has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Madeline Toubiana, Michael Lounsbury, Vern Glaser, Timothy R. Hannigan, Keyvan Vakili, P. Devereaux Jennings, Hovig Tchalian, Richard Franciscus Johannes Haans, Sarah Kaplan and Royston Greenwood. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management Journal and Administrative Science Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026