Michael Lamb

465 citations
24 papers · 246 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Augustinian Studies and Theology 5
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development 4
    • Values and Moral Education 3

Michael Lamb

23 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

Michael Lamb
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Information Systems and Management 39
  • Architecture 6
  • Education 92
  • Applied Psychology 16
  • Communication 18
Replace Olivia M. Little with:
Olivia M. Little United States
Teresa A. Wasonga United States
William Allan Kritsonis
Irene H. Yoon United States
Larry E. Frase United States
Ping-Man Wong Hong Kong
Linda Searby United States
Michelle Searle Canada
Julia Warwas Germany
Trond Eiliv Hauge Norway
Michael Lamb relative to Olivia M. Little United States Olivia M. Little's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Olivia M. Little · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lamb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lamb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lamb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lamb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lamb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lamb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lamb. The network helps show where Michael Lamb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Michael Lamb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Lamb Line = papers co-authored together Michael Lamb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201938
2 199836
3 202126
4 201923
5 202020
6 201918
7 201616
8 201215
9 20189
10 20238
11 20118
12 20226
13 20185
14 20233
15
Determining the need for a refresher course. Report of a study.
19903
16 20172
17 20242
18 20112
19 20242
20 20241

About Michael Lamb

Michael Lamb is a scholar working on Philosophy, Education, Information Systems and Management, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (5 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers), Values and Moral Education (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers) and Digital Games and Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (39 citations), Architecture (6 citations), Education (92 citations), Applied Psychology (16 citations) and Communication (18 citations). Michael Lamb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Edward Brooks, Alan Renwick, Eranda Jayawickreme, Olga Pierrakos, Emily Burdett, Mike Prentice, Michael J. Gross, Jessica Koehler, Wendy Booth and Heather M. Maranges. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Moral Education, Augustinian Studies, The Political Quarterly, The Journal of Positive Psychology and Journal of Religious Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact