Journal of Religious Ethics

787 papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 787 papers published in Journal of Religious Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Religious Ethics usually cover Sociology and Political Science (359 papers), Philosophy (356 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (275 papers) specifically the topics of Theology and Philosophy of Evil (131 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (123 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Religious Ethics are Keith Thomas, Richard Rorty, Sumner B. Twiss, Willis Jenkins, Aaron Stalnaker, Elizabeth M. Bucar, Robert M. Veatch, Richard B. Miller, Andreas Reinhart and John Kelsay.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Religious Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Religious Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Religious Ethics.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Religious Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Religious Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Religious Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Religious Ethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025