Michael Horvath

1.1k total citations
28 papers, 751 citations indexed

About

Michael Horvath is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Horvath has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 751 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Michael Horvath's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Employer Branding and e-HRM (4 papers). Michael Horvath is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Employer Branding and e-HRM (4 papers). Michael Horvath collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Michael Horvath's co-authors include Ann Marie Ryan, Paul Retish, Douglas C. Maynard, Steven G. Rogelberg, Gwenith G. Fisher, Milton D. Hakel, Ann Marie Ryan, Darrell Anthony Luzzo, S. David Kriska and Vasilios D. Kosteas and has published in prestigious journals such as Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, American Educational Research Journal and Personnel Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Michael Horvath

26 papers receiving 638 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Horvath United States 15 227 170 161 140 127 28 751
Caitlin M. Porter United States 12 262 1.2× 242 1.4× 157 1.0× 103 0.7× 72 0.6× 34 739
Serge P. da Motta Veiga United States 14 206 0.9× 339 2.0× 213 1.3× 82 0.6× 101 0.8× 30 792
Gerard A. Callanan United States 16 158 0.7× 329 1.9× 204 1.3× 406 2.9× 203 1.6× 25 966
Tracy Kantrowitz United States 10 245 1.1× 372 2.2× 324 2.0× 188 1.3× 116 0.9× 18 1.1k
Sarbari Bordia Australia 14 252 1.1× 445 2.6× 261 1.6× 177 1.3× 129 1.0× 35 958
Nathaniel Branden Switzerland 10 241 1.1× 154 0.9× 272 1.7× 125 0.9× 55 0.4× 26 834
Ariel Levi United States 13 330 1.5× 244 1.4× 201 1.2× 38 0.3× 61 0.5× 26 837
Ann Howard United States 11 141 0.6× 348 2.0× 274 1.7× 117 0.8× 48 0.4× 31 906
Brian A. Turner United States 14 281 1.2× 239 1.4× 263 1.6× 78 0.6× 56 0.4× 60 803
Polly Parker Australia 16 103 0.5× 265 1.6× 190 1.2× 355 2.5× 95 0.7× 33 799

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Horvath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Horvath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Horvath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Horvath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Horvath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Horvath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Horvath. The network helps show where Michael Horvath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Horvath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Horvath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Horvath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Horvath. Michael Horvath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Horvath, Michael, et al.. (2021). Employee Reactions to Interruptions from Family during Work. Occupational Health Science. 5(1-2). 141–162. 10 indexed citations
2.
Horvath, Michael, et al.. (2020). Individual difference and contextual predictors of flipped classroom behaviors and reactions: A longitudinal investigation.. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. 6(2). 91–103. 1 indexed citations
3.
Blake, Brian F., et al.. (2017). Generalizing the appeal of B2C site features across domains. Internet Research. 27(4). 730–751. 2 indexed citations
4.
Horvath, Michael. (2015). Predicting Work Outcomes From Religiosity and Perceived Calling. The Career Development Quarterly. 63(2). 141–155. 22 indexed citations
5.
Horvath, Michael. (2014). An integrative model of recruitment source processes and effects. Organizational Psychology Review. 5(2). 126–145. 2 indexed citations
6.
Horvath, Michael. (2013). Spiritual gilts inventories: a psychometric perspective. ˜The œJournal of psychology and Christianity. 32(2). 124–134.
7.
Laurene, Kimberly R., et al.. (2011). Perception of Free Will: The Perspective of Incarcerated Adolescent and Adult Offenders. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2(4). 723–740. 10 indexed citations
8.
Horvath, Michael. (2010). The Opportunity to Upload Cover Letters and Procedural Fairness Perceptions: A Time Series Analysis. 1 indexed citations
9.
Horvath, Michael, et al.. (2007). The Role of Fairness Perceptions and Accountability Attributions in Predicting Reactions to Organizational Events. The Journal of Psychology. 141(2). 203–222. 20 indexed citations
10.
Horvath, Michael, et al.. (2006). Goal orientation, task difficulty, and task interest: A multilevel analysis. Motivation and Emotion. 30(2). 169–176. 42 indexed citations
11.
Retish, Paul, et al.. (2005). Academic Preparation of Adolescents With Disabilities for Postsecondary Education. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals. 28(1). 26–35. 36 indexed citations
12.
Bresnahan, Timothy F., Gordon Moore, Catherine de Fontenay, et al.. (2004). Building High-Tech Clusters. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 94 indexed citations
13.
Rogelberg, Steven G., Gwenith G. Fisher, Douglas C. Maynard, Milton D. Hakel, & Michael Horvath. (2001). Attitudes toward Surveys: Development of a Measure and Its Relationship to Respondent Behavior. Organizational Research Methods. 4(1). 3–25. 90 indexed citations
14.
Horvath, Michael, et al.. (2000). The Influence of Explanations for Selection Test Use, Outcome Favorability, and Self-Efficacy on Test-Taker Perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 83(2). 310–330. 51 indexed citations
15.
Ryan, Ann Marie, Michael Horvath, Robert E. Ployhart, Neal Schmitt, & Lance Slade. (2000). HYPOTHESIZING DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING IN GLOBAL EMPLOYEE OPINION SURVEYS. Personnel Psychology. 53(3). 531–562. 28 indexed citations
16.
Luzzo, Darrell Anthony, et al.. (1998). Identifying the Career Development Needs of College Students with Disabilities.. Journal of college student development. 39(1). 23–32. 27 indexed citations
17.
Horvath, Michael. (1985). Statistics for educators. 2 indexed citations
18.
Horvath, Michael, et al.. (1980). An Example of the Use of Fuzzy Set Concepts in Modeling Learning Disability. American Educational Research Journal. 17(3). 309–309. 1 indexed citations
19.
Horvath, Michael. (1978). AN IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE IN LEARNING DISABILITY THROUGH FUZZY SET MODELING OF A VERBAL THEORY. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 2 indexed citations
20.
Horvath, Michael, et al.. (1974). SCL-90 rating scale: first experience with the Czech version in healthy male scientific workers.. PubMed. 16(2). 115–6. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026