Meredith Young

5.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
110 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Meredith Young is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Meredith Young has authored 110 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 71 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 45 papers in Family Practice and 26 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Meredith Young's work include Innovations in Medical Education (67 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (45 papers) and Radiology practices and education (20 papers). Meredith Young is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (67 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (45 papers) and Radiology practices and education (20 papers). Meredith Young collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Meredith Young's co-authors include Lara Varpio, Geoff Norman, Lee R. Brooks, Aliki Thomas, Geoffrey R. Norman, Nicholas B. King, Elise Paradis, Sebastian Uijtdehaage, Stuart Lubarsky and Sam Harper and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Meredith Young

105 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Hit Papers

The Distinctions Between ... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 100 200 300

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Meredith Young 1.5k 1.0k 689 369 316 110 3.1k
Julian Archer 2.1k 1.3× 832 0.8× 873 1.3× 427 1.2× 220 0.7× 131 3.3k
Timothy J. Wood 2.1k 1.4× 998 1.0× 907 1.3× 583 1.6× 221 0.7× 128 4.5k
Ara Tekian 2.2k 1.4× 613 0.6× 764 1.1× 405 1.1× 257 0.8× 184 3.2k
Claudio Violato 2.2k 1.4× 793 0.8× 922 1.3× 462 1.3× 178 0.6× 158 4.9k
Rachel Ellaway 2.1k 1.4× 562 0.5× 1.0k 1.5× 373 1.0× 323 1.0× 172 3.7k
Ayelet Kuper 2.2k 1.4× 630 0.6× 1.5k 2.2× 272 0.7× 479 1.5× 98 4.3k
Sally A. Santen 2.8k 1.8× 1.0k 1.0× 1.2k 1.8× 634 1.7× 277 0.9× 297 4.3k
Fedde Scheele 3.3k 2.2× 1.2k 1.2× 1.5k 2.1× 560 1.5× 336 1.1× 213 5.0k
Renée E. Stalmeijer 1.7k 1.1× 521 0.5× 1.1k 1.7× 191 0.5× 173 0.5× 85 3.2k
Maria Mylopoulos 1.6k 1.0× 924 0.9× 735 1.1× 220 0.6× 129 0.4× 105 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Young. The network helps show where Meredith Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meredith Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meredith Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meredith Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meredith Young. Meredith Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ellaway, Rachel, Bridget C. OʼBrien, Jonathan Sherbino, et al.. (2024). Is There a Problem With Evidence in Health Professions Education?. Academic Medicine. 99(8). 841–848. 4 indexed citations
2.
Young, Meredith, et al.. (2024). Characterizing Research Teams. Academic Medicine. 100(3). 402–402.
4.
Young, Meredith, et al.. (2024). What if we consider research teams as teams?. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 30(2). 579–586.
5.
Young, Meredith, et al.. (2024). Eight ways to get a grip on validity as a social imperative. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 15(3). 100–103. 1 indexed citations
6.
Dory, Valérie, et al.. (2023). If we assess, will they learn? Students’ perspectives on the complexities of assessment-for-learning. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 14(4). 94–104. 1 indexed citations
7.
Saberzadeh-Ardestani, Bahar, Ali Reza Sima, Bardia Khosravi, Meredith Young, & Sara Mortaz Hejri. (2023). The impact of prior performance information on subsequent assessment: is there evidence of retaliation in an anonymous multisource assessment system?. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 29(2). 531–550. 1 indexed citations
8.
Young, Meredith, et al.. (2023). The race that never slows: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery residency applicant parameters over time. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 14(6). 31–39.
9.
Hunderfund, Andrea N. Leep, et al.. (2023). Picking Up Where the Authors Left Off: Reading Research in Medical Education. Academic Medicine. 98(Supplement_3). S1–S5. 1 indexed citations
10.
Dory, Valérie, Deborah Danoff, Laurie H. Plotnick, et al.. (2020). Does Educational Handover Influence Subsequent Assessment?. Academic Medicine. 96(1). 118–125. 14 indexed citations
11.
Young, Meredith, Aliki Thomas, David Gordon, et al.. (2019). The terminology of clinical reasoning in health professions education: Implications and considerations. Medical Teacher. 41(11). 1277–1284. 61 indexed citations
12.
Thomas, Aliki, Stuart Lubarsky, Lara Varpio, Steven J. Durning, & Meredith Young. (2019). Scoping reviews in health professions education: challenges, considerations and lessons learned about epistemology and methodology. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 25(4). 989–1002. 85 indexed citations
13.
St‐Onge, Christina, Meredith Young, & Lara Varpio. (2019). Development and validation of a health profession education-focused scholarly mentorship assessment tool. Perspectives on Medical Education. 8(1). 43–46. 2 indexed citations
14.
Gallagher, Frances, et al.. (2018). Validity as a social imperative for assessment in health professions education: a concept analysis. Medical Education. 52(6). 641–653. 31 indexed citations
15.
Young, Meredith, et al.. (2018). Characterizing the literature on validity and assessment in medical education: a bibliometric study. Perspectives on Medical Education. 7(3). 182–191. 14 indexed citations
16.
Thomas, Aliki, Stuart Lubarsky, Steven J. Durning, & Meredith Young. (2016). Knowledge Syntheses in Medical Education: Demystifying Scoping Reviews. Academic Medicine. 92(2). 161–166. 154 indexed citations
17.
McConnell, Meghan, Christina St‐Onge, & Meredith Young. (2014). The benefits of testing for learning on later performance. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 20(2). 305–320. 46 indexed citations
18.
Young, Meredith, Sylvia R. Cruess, Richard L. Cruess, & Yvonne Steinert. (2013). The Professionalism Assessment of Clinical Teachers (PACT): the reliability and validity of a novel tool to evaluate professional and clinical teaching behaviors. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 19(1). 99–113. 17 indexed citations
19.
Young, Meredith, et al.. (2009). Food for thought. What you eat depends on your sex and eating companions. Appetite. 53(2). 268–271. 56 indexed citations
20.
Young, Meredith, Lee R. Brooks, & Geoff Norman. (2007). Found in translation: the impact of familiar symptom descriptions on diagnosis in novices. Medical Education. 41(12). 1146–1151. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026