Joseph Rencic

1.7k total citations
39 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Joseph Rencic is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Joseph Rencic has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Family Practice, 28 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 10 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Joseph Rencic's work include Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (28 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (27 papers) and Radiology practices and education (10 papers). Joseph Rencic is often cited by papers focused on Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (28 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (27 papers) and Radiology practices and education (10 papers). Joseph Rencic collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Joseph Rencic's co-authors include Steven J. Durning, Eric S. Holmboe, Larry D. Gruppen, Stuart Lubarsky, Tiffany N.S. Ballard, Temple Ratcliffe, Lambert Schuwirth, Robert L. Trowbridge, David Gordon and Meredith Young and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Joseph Rencic

36 papers receiving 975 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joseph Rencic United States 16 808 769 278 138 121 39 1.0k
Thierry Pelaccia France 14 364 0.5× 384 0.5× 89 0.3× 67 0.5× 117 1.0× 63 781
Marie‐Claude Audétat Switzerland 17 552 0.7× 646 0.8× 138 0.5× 126 0.9× 107 0.9× 72 881
Gordon Page Canada 11 464 0.6× 582 0.8× 192 0.7× 56 0.4× 58 0.5× 15 716
Kimberly D. Lomis United States 18 210 0.3× 613 0.8× 142 0.5× 81 0.6× 72 0.6× 37 852
Kees van den Berge Netherlands 7 421 0.5× 283 0.4× 143 0.5× 82 0.6× 98 0.8× 10 571
Frank J. Papa United States 13 266 0.3× 324 0.4× 82 0.3× 56 0.4× 49 0.4× 38 577
Jennifer Stojan United States 10 181 0.2× 298 0.4× 74 0.3× 54 0.4× 60 0.5× 27 513
M. Schoonheim‐Klein Netherlands 15 182 0.2× 462 0.6× 136 0.5× 28 0.2× 49 0.4× 20 845
Madalena Patrício Portugal 11 174 0.2× 452 0.6× 89 0.3× 58 0.4× 52 0.4× 19 628
Damon Dagnone Canada 12 321 0.4× 612 0.8× 148 0.5× 40 0.3× 52 0.4× 34 766

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Rencic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Rencic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Rencic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Rencic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Rencic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Rencic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Rencic. The network helps show where Joseph Rencic may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph Rencic

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph Rencic. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph Rencic based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph Rencic. Joseph Rencic is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Durning, Steven J., et al.. (2024). Ecological Psychology: A Framework for Mentoring and Career Development in Academic Medicine. Academic Medicine. 100(3). 281–287.
2.
Rencic, Joseph, et al.. (2022). Self-regulated learning and the future of diagnostic reasoning education. Diagnosis. 10(1). 24–30. 7 indexed citations
3.
Parsons, Andrew S., et al.. (2022). Management Reasoning: A Toolbox for Educators. Academic Medicine. 97(11). 1724–1724. 2 indexed citations
4.
Gordon, David, Joseph Rencic, Valerie J. Lang, et al.. (2022). Advancing the assessment of clinical reasoning across the health professions: Definitional and methodologic recommendations. Perspectives on Medical Education. 11(2). 108–104. 13 indexed citations
5.
Olson, Andrew, et al.. (2020). Teamwork in clinical reasoning – cooperative or parallel play?. Diagnosis. 7(3). 307–312. 20 indexed citations
6.
Torre, Dario, Steven J. Durning, Joseph Rencic, et al.. (2020). Widening the lens on teaching and assessing clinical reasoning: from “in the head” to “out in the world”. Diagnosis. 7(3). 181–190. 16 indexed citations
7.
Rencic, Joseph, Lambert Schuwirth, Larry D. Gruppen, & Steven J. Durning. (2020). Clinical reasoning performance assessment: using situated cognition theory as a conceptual framework. Diagnosis. 7(3). 241–249. 19 indexed citations
8.
Rencic, Joseph, Lambert Schuwirth, Larry D. Gruppen, & Steven J. Durning. (2020). A situated cognition model for clinical reasoning performance assessment: a narrative review. Diagnosis. 7(3). 227–240. 15 indexed citations
9.
Young, Meredith, Aliki Thomas, Stuart Lubarsky, et al.. (2020). Mapping clinical reasoning literature across the health professions: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. 20(1). 107–107. 85 indexed citations
10.
Young, Meredith, Aliki Thomas, David Gordon, et al.. (2019). The terminology of clinical reasoning in health professions education: Implications and considerations. Medical Teacher. 41(11). 1277–1284. 61 indexed citations
11.
Olson, Andrew, Joseph Rencic, Karen Cosby, et al.. (2019). Competencies for improving diagnosis: an interprofessional framework for education and training in health care. Diagnosis. 6(4). 335–341. 66 indexed citations
12.
Rencic, Joseph, et al.. (2019). Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of chest pain and shortness of breath. Diagnosis. 6(4). 387–392. 1 indexed citations
13.
Daniel, Michelle, Joseph Rencic, Steven J. Durning, et al.. (2019). Clinical Reasoning Assessment Methods: A Scoping Review and Practical Guidance. Academic Medicine. 94(6). 902–912. 173 indexed citations
14.
Graber, Mark L., Joseph Rencic, Frank J. Papa, et al.. (2018). Improving diagnosis by improving education: a policy brief on education in healthcare professions. Diagnosis. 5(3). 107–118. 54 indexed citations
15.
Thammasitboon, Satid, et al.. (2018). The Assessment of Reasoning Tool (ART): structuring the conversation between teachers and learners. Diagnosis. 5(4). 197–203. 27 indexed citations
16.
Rencic, Joseph, Robert L. Trowbridge, Mark J. Fagan, Karen Szauter, & Steven J. Durning. (2017). Clinical Reasoning Education at US Medical Schools: Results from a National Survey of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 32(11). 1242–1246. 90 indexed citations
17.
Rencic, Joseph, Mengyu Zhou, Gerald C Hsu, & Gurpreet Dhaliwal. (2017). Circling Back for the Diagnosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 377(18). 1778–1784. 1 indexed citations
18.
Shah, Urvi A., et al.. (2015). Exercises In Clinical Reasoning. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 30(6). 860–863.
19.
Erickson, Brandon J., Gurpreet Dhaliwal, Mark C. Henderson, Ezra A. Amsterdam, & Joseph Rencic. (2011). Effusive Reasoning. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 26(10). 1204–1208. 5 indexed citations
20.
Rencic, Joseph. (2011). Twelve tips for teaching expertise in clinical reasoning. Medical Teacher. 33(11). 887–892. 71 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026