Frances Gallagher

898 total citations
54 papers, 506 citations indexed

About

Frances Gallagher is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Frances Gallagher has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 506 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in General Health Professions, 17 papers in Epidemiology and 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Frances Gallagher's work include Chronic Disease Management Strategies (12 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers). Frances Gallagher is often cited by papers focused on Chronic Disease Management Strategies (12 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers). Frances Gallagher collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United Kingdom. Frances Gallagher's co-authors include Martin Fortin, Mélanie Couture, Maud‐Christine Chouinard, Marie-Ève Poitras, Meredith Young, Christina St‐Onge, Denise St‐Cyr Tribble, Patricia Bourgault, Mélanie Levasseur and Sonia Routhier and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Medical Education.

In The Last Decade

Frances Gallagher

49 papers receiving 485 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frances Gallagher Canada 15 221 129 107 84 59 54 506
Elaine Burland Canada 14 255 1.2× 86 0.7× 93 0.9× 92 1.1× 53 0.9× 38 584
Carole Taylor Canada 12 205 0.9× 66 0.5× 76 0.7× 92 1.1× 46 0.8× 35 455
Phillip Beatty United States 10 214 1.0× 188 1.5× 84 0.8× 81 1.0× 65 1.1× 17 657
Richard Crespo United States 13 182 0.8× 65 0.5× 85 0.8× 88 1.0× 33 0.6× 17 459
Joykrishna Sarkar Canada 12 194 0.9× 69 0.5× 71 0.7× 81 1.0× 30 0.5× 30 419
Juliet MacArthur United Kingdom 16 211 1.0× 89 0.7× 221 2.1× 192 2.3× 48 0.8× 36 627
Lars Jerdén Sweden 13 207 0.9× 68 0.5× 124 1.2× 79 0.9× 34 0.6× 35 483
Heidi Muenchberger Australia 15 357 1.6× 269 2.1× 75 0.7× 75 0.9× 45 0.8× 38 689
Wichit Srisuphan Thailand 13 293 1.3× 89 0.7× 121 1.1× 58 0.7× 73 1.2× 37 679
Julie Armin United States 14 392 1.8× 94 0.7× 166 1.6× 117 1.4× 146 2.5× 44 777

Countries citing papers authored by Frances Gallagher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frances Gallagher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frances Gallagher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frances Gallagher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frances Gallagher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frances Gallagher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frances Gallagher. The network helps show where Frances Gallagher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frances Gallagher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frances Gallagher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frances Gallagher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frances Gallagher. Frances Gallagher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Young, Meredith, et al.. (2024). Eight ways to get a grip on validity as a social imperative. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 15(3). 100–103. 1 indexed citations
3.
4.
Thomas, Aliki, Christina St‐Onge, Jean‐Sébastien Renaud, et al.. (2023). Measuring Health Care Work–Related Contextual Factors: Development of the McGill Context Tool. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 44(1). 18–27. 2 indexed citations
5.
Carranza‐Mamane, Belina, Marie‐France Langlois, Anne‐Sophie Morisset, et al.. (2022). Protocol of the Fit-For-Fertility study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing a lifestyle programme targeting women with obesity and infertility. BMJ Open. 12(4). e061554–e061554. 2 indexed citations
6.
St‐Onge, Christina, et al.. (2022). Validity as a social imperative: users’ and leaders’ perceptions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 13(3). 22–36. 3 indexed citations
7.
Couture, Mélanie, et al.. (2021). Obstacles to the transition to adulthood of people with severe to profound intellectual disability and potential solutions: Perspectives of professionals in one region of Quebec. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability. 46(3). 239–249. 5 indexed citations
8.
Ngangue, Patrice, Judith Belle Brown, Mohamed Ali Ag Ahmed, et al.. (2021). Evaluating the implementation of interdisciplinary patient-centred care intervention for people with multimorbidity in primary care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 11(9). e046914–e046914. 4 indexed citations
10.
Lavoie, Stéphan, et al.. (2020). Elements of group dynamics that influence learning in small groups in undergraduate students: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today. 87. 104362–104362. 17 indexed citations
11.
Gallagher, Frances, et al.. (2018). Validity as a social imperative for assessment in health professions education: a concept analysis. Medical Education. 52(6). 641–653. 31 indexed citations
12.
Beaudoin, Audrée Jeanne, et al.. (2017). Scoping review of social participation of individuals with profound intellectual disability in adulthood: What can I do once I finish school?. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability. 44(2). 248–260. 17 indexed citations
13.
Gallagher, Frances, et al.. (2017). Specific needs of families of young adults with profound intellectual disability during and after transition to adulthood: What are we missing?. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 66. 16–26. 44 indexed citations
14.
Poitras, Marie-Ève, Maud‐Christine Chouinard, Martin Fortin, & Frances Gallagher. (2016). How to report professional practice in nursing? A scoping review. BMC Nursing. 15(1). 31–31. 17 indexed citations
15.
Bourgault, Patricia, et al.. (2015). Knowledge and Beliefs about Chronic Non Cancer Pain Management for Family Medicine Group Nurses. Pain Management Nursing. 16(6). 951–958. 6 indexed citations
16.
Gallagher, Frances, et al.. (2012). Breast Cancer Screening Program: Experiences of Canadian Women and Their Unmet Needs. Health Care For Women International. 34(1). 34–49. 10 indexed citations
17.
Gallagher, Frances, et al.. (2012). Supporting parents of preschool children in adopting a healthy lifestyle. BMC Nursing. 11(1). 12–12. 7 indexed citations
18.
Fortin, Martin, Catherine Hudon, Frances Gallagher, et al.. (2010). Nurses joining family doctors in primary care practices: perceptions of patients with multimorbidity. BMC Family Practice. 11(1). 84–84. 17 indexed citations
19.
Bourgault, Patricia, Frances Gallagher, Cécile Michaud, & Denise St‐Cyr Tribble. (2010). Le devis mixte en sciences infirmières ou quand une question de recherche appelle des stratégies qualitatives et quantitatives. Recherche en soins infirmiers. N° 103(4). 20–28. 10 indexed citations
20.
Tribble, Denise St‐Cyr, Frances Gallagher, Linda Bell, et al.. (2008). Empowerment interventions, knowledge translation and exchange: perspectives of home care professionals, clients and caregivers. BMC Health Services Research. 8(1). 177–177. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026