Maud Besançon
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Education top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Todd LubartBaptiste BarbotFranck ZenasniCorentin GonthierFabien FenouilletRébecca ShanklandJacques GrégoireThalia R. Goldstein
- Topics
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (27 papers)Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (9 papers)Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (8 papers)
- Cited by
- Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyVisual Arts and Performing ArtsDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Maud Besançon
34 papers receiving 817 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 654
- Cognitive Neuroscience 220
- Education 197
- Social Psychology 179
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 154
Countries citing papers authored by Maud Besançon
This map shows the geographic impact of Maud Besançon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maud Besançon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maud Besançon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maud Besançon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maud Besançon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maud Besançon. The network helps show where Maud Besançon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maud Besançon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maud Besançon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maud Besançon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maud Besançon. Maud Besançon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | Creative potential: assessment issues and the EPoC Battery | 2 |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | La créativité chez les enfants à haut potentiel | 2 |
| 16 | Le centenaire de la mort d'Alfred Binet | 1 |
| 17 | High creative potential | 2 |
| 18 | 120 | |
| 19 | 119 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Maud Besançon
Maud Besançon is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 880 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (27 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (9 papers) and Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (654 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (98 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (154 citations). Maud Besançon has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Todd Lubart, Baptiste Barbot, Franck Zenasni, Corentin Gonthier, Fabien Fenouillet, Rébecca Shankland, Jacques Grégoire, Thalia R. Goldstein, Jacques‐Henri Guignard and Anatoliy V. Kharkhurin. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Intelligence and Learning and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.