Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Investing in creativity.
1996786 citationsRobert J. Sternberg, Todd Lubartprofile →
An Investment Theory of Creativity and Its Development
1991685 citationsRobert J. Sternberg, Todd Lubartprofile →
Models of the Creative Process: Past, Present and Future
Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education
2023218 citationsJean‐Marie Burkhardt, Samira Bourgeois‐Bougrine et al.Journal of Intelligenceprofile →
Advancing Creativity Theory and Research: A Socio‐cultural Manifesto
2019213 citationsVlad Petre Glăveanu, Michael Hanchett Hanson et al.The Journal of Creative Behaviorprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Todd Lubart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Todd Lubart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Todd Lubart more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Todd Lubart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Todd Lubart. The network helps show where Todd Lubart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Todd Lubart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Todd Lubart.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Todd Lubart based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Todd Lubart. Todd Lubart is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rafner, Janet, Roger E. Beaty, James C. Kaufman, Todd Lubart, & Jacob Sherson. (2023). Creativity in the age of generative AI. Nature Human Behaviour. 7(11). 1836–1838.62 indexed citations
Besançon, Maud & Todd Lubart. (2012). La créativité chez les enfants à haut potentiel. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).2 indexed citations
14.
Andrieu, Bernard, Baptiste Barbot, Maud Besançon, et al.. (2011). Le centenaire de la mort d'Alfred Binet. OpenEdition (OpenEdition).1 indexed citations
Lubart, Todd. (2006). Creativity from a Cognitive Developmental Science Perspective. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28).3 indexed citations
17.
Lubart, Todd, Évelyne Marmèche, & Nathalie Bonnardel. (2006). Arte y cognición. 46–49.2 indexed citations
18.
Georgsdottir, Asta S. & Todd Lubart. (2003). La flexibilité cognitive et la créativité: une approche développementale, différentielle et expérimentale. Psychologie Française. 48(3). 29–40.5 indexed citations
19.
Zenasni, Franck & Todd Lubart. (2001). Adaptation française d'une épreuve de Tolérance à l'ambiguïté : Le M.A.T.. 51. 3–12.5 indexed citations
20.
Sternberg, Robert J. & Todd Lubart. (1991). Creating Creative Minds.. Phi Delta Kappan. 72(8).81 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.