Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Qualitative Studies in Special Education
20051.3k citationsEllen Brantlinger, Robert T. Jiménez et al.Exceptional Childrenprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Marleen C. Pugach
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Marleen C. Pugach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marleen C. Pugach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marleen C. Pugach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marleen C. Pugach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marleen C. Pugach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marleen C. Pugach. The network helps show where Marleen C. Pugach may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marleen C. Pugach
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marleen C. Pugach.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marleen C. Pugach based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Marleen C. Pugach. Marleen C. Pugach is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pugach, Marleen C. & Charles A. Peck. (2016). Dividing Practices: Preservice Teacher Quality Assessment and the (Re)production of Relations between General and Special Education.. Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.). 43(3). 3–23.10 indexed citations
Brantlinger, Ellen, Robert T. Jiménez, Janette K. Klingner, Marleen C. Pugach, & Virginia Richardson. (2005). Qualitative Studies in Special Education. Exceptional Children. 71(2). 195–207.1306 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Pugach, Marleen C., et al.. (2002). A Framework for Integrating Technology into Teacher Preparation Programs. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2002(1). 1491–1491.1 indexed citations
Pugach, Marleen C., et al.. (1996). Forming Partnerships around Curriculum.. Educational leadership. 53(5). 62–65.6 indexed citations
11.
Pugach, Marleen C. & Barbara L. Seidl. (1996). Deconstructing the Diversity-Disability Connection.. Contemporary education. 68(1). 5–8.16 indexed citations
12.
Pugach, Marleen C., et al.. (1996). Curriculum trends, special education, and reform : refocusing the conversation. Teachers College Press eBooks.26 indexed citations
13.
Pugach, Marleen C., et al.. (1995). The real sellout: Failing to give inclusion a chance: A response to Roberts and Mather.. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 10(4).4 indexed citations
Pugach, Marleen C., et al.. (1991). Changing the Practice of Teacher Education. The Role of the Knowledge Base..7 indexed citations
16.
Pugach, Marleen C., et al.. (1990). Collaborative Planning for Urban Professional Development Schools.. Contemporary education. 61(3).9 indexed citations
17.
Pugach, Marleen C.. (1990). The Moral Cost of Retrenchment in Special Education.. The Journal of Special Education. 24(3).4 indexed citations
Pugach, Marleen C.. (1979). Education for the Handicapped: Are We Making Any Progress?.. 1(4). 11–14.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.