Karen M. Weller

632 total citations
22 papers, 484 citations indexed

About

Karen M. Weller is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Karen M. Weller has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 484 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Food Science, 9 papers in Plant Science and 6 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Karen M. Weller's work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (12 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (9 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (6 papers). Karen M. Weller is often cited by papers focused on Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (12 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (9 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (6 papers). Karen M. Weller collaborates with scholars based in United States. Karen M. Weller's co-authors include Carolyn F. Ross, James F. Harbertson, Joseph R. Powers, Maria S. Mireles, J. Richard Alldredge, William F. Siems, Herbert H. Hill, C. W. Nagel, Jeffri C. Bohlscheid and John P. Reganold and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Food Science and LWT.

In The Last Decade

Karen M. Weller

21 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Karen M. Weller United States 14 377 197 109 78 74 22 484
Marjorie King Canada 15 521 1.4× 400 2.0× 114 1.0× 40 0.5× 74 1.0× 28 677
Arancha de-la-Fuente-Blanco Spain 12 514 1.4× 305 1.5× 74 0.7× 57 0.7× 136 1.8× 17 565
Maria Daria Fumi Italy 10 231 0.6× 130 0.7× 87 0.8× 31 0.4× 38 0.5× 25 309
Debra Inglis Canada 15 633 1.7× 360 1.8× 61 0.6× 161 2.1× 183 2.5× 29 717
Ragnhild Solheim Sweden 11 472 1.3× 124 0.6× 206 1.9× 35 0.4× 68 0.9× 13 658
Shane Walker New Zealand 9 403 1.1× 587 3.0× 162 1.5× 82 1.1× 128 1.7× 12 890
Laurence Fillion United Kingdom 8 241 0.6× 194 1.0× 124 1.1× 30 0.4× 54 0.7× 9 500
Antonio Mincione Italy 13 243 0.6× 129 0.7× 82 0.8× 53 0.7× 70 0.9× 30 418
Mathilde Charles Italy 11 263 0.7× 279 1.4× 148 1.4× 65 0.8× 68 0.9× 15 608
Yves Le Fur France 9 255 0.7× 126 0.6× 42 0.4× 33 0.4× 36 0.5× 24 308

Countries citing papers authored by Karen M. Weller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen M. Weller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen M. Weller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen M. Weller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen M. Weller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen M. Weller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen M. Weller. The network helps show where Karen M. Weller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen M. Weller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen M. Weller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen M. Weller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen M. Weller. Karen M. Weller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Diako, Charles, et al.. (2017). Determination of 4‐ethylcatechol in a Merlot wine using sensory evaluation and the electronic tongue. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 52(11). 2489–2496. 13 indexed citations
2.
Nagel, C. W., et al.. (2015). A comparison of the fermentation patterns of six commercial wine yeasts. Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut). 27(3). 173.
3.
Kaspar, Kerrie L., Jean Soon Park, C. R. Brown, et al.. (2013). Sensory Evaluation of Pigmented Flesh Potatoes (<i>Solanum tuberosum</i> L.). Food and Nutrition Sciences. 4(1). 77–81. 8 indexed citations
4.
Ross, Carolyn F., Karen M. Weller, & J. Richard Alldredge. (2012). Impact of Serving Temperature on Sensory Properties of Red Wine as Evaluated Using Projective Mapping by a Trained Panel. Journal of Sensory Studies. 27(6). 463–470. 35 indexed citations
5.
Harbertson, James F., et al.. (2009). Chemical and Sensory Effects of Saignée, Water Addition, and Extended Maceration on High Brix Must. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 60(4). 450–460. 69 indexed citations
6.
Ross, Carolyn F., et al.. (2009). Difference Testing of Merlot Produced from Biodynamically and Organically Grown Wine Grapes. Journal of Wine Research. 20(2). 85–94. 21 indexed citations
7.
Ross, Carolyn F. & Karen M. Weller. (2008). Development of a Low-Alcohol Drink Similar in Sensory Properties to a Full-Alcohol Drink. Journal of alcohol and drug education. 52(3). 37–45. 1 indexed citations
8.
Ross, Carolyn F., Jeffri C. Bohlscheid, & Karen M. Weller. (2008). Influence of Visual Masking Technique on the Assessment of 2 Red Wines by Trained and Consumer Assessors. Journal of Food Science. 73(6). S279–85. 26 indexed citations
9.
Ross, Carolyn F. & Karen M. Weller. (2008). EFFECT OF SERVING TEMPERATURE ON THE SENSORY ATTRIBUTES OF RED AND WHITE WINES. Journal of Sensory Studies. 23(3). 398–416. 35 indexed citations
10.
Weller, Karen M., et al.. (2008). Chemical and Sensory Evaluation of Astringency in Washington State Red Wines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 59(2). 153–158. 57 indexed citations
11.
Ross, Carolyn F. & Karen M. Weller. (2007). Sensory Evaluation of SuspectedHarmonia axyridis-tainted Red Wine Using Untrained Panelists. Journal of Wine Research. 18(3). 187–193. 7 indexed citations
12.
Ross, Carolyn F., Holly J. Ferguson, Markus Keller, et al.. (2007). DETERMINATION OF ORTHO‐NASAL AROMA THRESHOLD FOR MULTICOLORED ASIAN LADY BEETLE IN A CONCORD GRAPE JUICE. Journal of Food Quality. 30(6). 855–863. 9 indexed citations
13.
Ross, Carolyn F., et al.. (2007). EFFICACY OF PALATE CLEANSERS FOR REDUCTION OF ASTRINGENCY CARRYOVER DURING REPEATED INGESTIONS OF RED WINE. Journal of Sensory Studies. 22(3). 293–312. 42 indexed citations
14.
Ross, Carolyn F., et al.. (2006). EFFECT OF STORAGE CONDITIONS ON THE SENSORY QUALITY OF GROUND ARABICA COFFEE. Journal of Food Quality. 29(6). 596–606. 32 indexed citations
15.
Weller, Karen M. & David W. Weller. (2004). In Focus/Executive coaching: Coaching and performance: Substantiating the link. Leadership in Action. 24(2). 20–21. 6 indexed citations
17.
Powers, Joseph R., et al.. (2002). Matrix‐Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time‐of‐Flight Mass Spectrometry Method for the Quantification of β‐Casein Fragment (f 193‐209). Journal of Food Science. 67(2). 534–538. 19 indexed citations
18.
Yang, Jian, Joseph R. Powers, Terri D. Boylston, & Karen M. Weller. (1999). Sugars and Free Amino Acids in Stored Russet Burbank Potatoes Treated with CIPC and Alternative Sprout Inhibitors. Journal of Food Science. 64(4). 592–596. 17 indexed citations
19.
Edwards, Charles G., et al.. (1993). Lactobacillus spp. from Washington State Wines: Isolation and Characterization. Journal of Food Science. 58(2). 453–458. 15 indexed citations
20.
Nagel, C. W. & Karen M. Weller. (1989). Colorimetric Determination of Urea in Wine. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 40(2). 143–144. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026