Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent
2000967 citationsMargaret C. Campbell, Amna KirmaniJournal of Consumer Researchprofile →
Perceptions of Price Unfairness: Antecedents and Consequences
1999644 citationsMargaret C. CampbellJournal of Marketing Researchprofile →
Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects
2003617 citationsMargaret C. Campbell et al.Journal of Consumer Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret C. Campbell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret C. Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret C. Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret C. Campbell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret C. Campbell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret C. Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret C. Campbell. The network helps show where Margaret C. Campbell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret C. Campbell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret C. Campbell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret C. Campbell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret C. Campbell. Margaret C. Campbell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Campbell, Margaret C., et al.. (2018). When Buffers Backfire: Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation and Consumer Response to Corporate Ethical Transgressions. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Warren, Caleb & Margaret C. Campbell. (2012). A Risk of Meaning Transfer: Are Negative Associations More Likely to Transfer ThanPositive Associations?.4 indexed citations
Warren, Caleb & Margaret C. Campbell. (2011). What Makes Things Cool? How Autonomy Influences Perceptions of Coolness. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Gilovich, Thomas, Margaret C. Campbell, & Leaf Van Boven. (2010). Stigmatizing Materialism: On Stereotypes and Impressions of Materialistic and Experiential Pursuits.1 indexed citations
14.
Campbell, Margaret C.. (2008). The Role of Inferences of Impact on Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Osselaer, Stijn M. J. van, Suresh Ramanathan, Margaret C. Campbell, et al.. (2005). Choice Based on Goals. Marketing Letters. 16(3-4). 335–346.63 indexed citations
Campbell, Margaret C. & Amna Kirmani. (2000). Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent. Journal of Consumer Research. 27(1). 69–83.967 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Campbell, Margaret C. & Jennifer Aaker. (1996). Special Session Summary the Role of Role in Consumers' Responses to Advertising, Sales, and Service Interactions. ACR North American Advances.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.