M. J. Bishop
- Education top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Information Systems top 2%
- Computer Science Applications top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- J. Michael SpectorJan ElenMargaret MerrillPatricia J. Slagter van TryonAndrew WalkerJennifer M. BrillWard Mitchell CatesDaniel T. Hickey
- Topics
- Online and Blended Learning (7 papers)Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers)Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
M. J. Bishop
19 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Education 646
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 342
- Information Systems 260
- Computer Science Applications 213
- Sociology and Political Science 138
Countries citing papers authored by M. J. Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. J. Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Bishop. The network helps show where M. J. Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. J. Bishop
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. J. Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. J. Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. J. Bishop. M. J. Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technologybreakdown → | 809 |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 106 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | The Clipper Project: Discovering What Online Courses Offer Residential Universities. | 5 |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | Identifying "E-mmediacy" Strategies for Web-Based Instruction: A Delphi Study | 12 |
| 14 | 152 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | A Door Is a Big Wooden Thing with a Knob: Getting a Handle on Metaphorical Interface Design | 4 |
About M. J. Bishop
M. J. Bishop is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Computer Science Applications and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (7 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (213 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (342 citations) and Education (646 citations). M. J. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include J. Michael Spector, Jan Elen, Margaret Merrill, Patricia J. Slagter van Tryon, Andrew Walker, Jennifer M. Brill, Ward Mitchell Cates, Daniel T. Hickey, Lana Edwards Santoro and Xiaoli Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Technology Research and Development, Psychology in the Schools and Distance Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.