M. J. Bishop

2.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

M. J. Bishop is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, M. J. Bishop has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Education, 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in M. J. Bishop's work include Online and Blended Learning (7 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers). M. J. Bishop is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (7 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers). M. J. Bishop collaborates with scholars based in United States and Belgium. M. J. Bishop's co-authors include J. Michael Spector, Jan Elen, Margaret Merrill, Patricia J. Slagter van Tryon, Andrew Walker, Jennifer M. Brill, Ward Mitchell Cates, Daniel T. Hickey, Lana Edwards Santoro and Xiaoli Zhao and has published in prestigious journals such as Educational Technology Research and Development, Psychology in the Schools and Distance Education.

In The Last Decade

M. J. Bishop

19 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Te... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. J. Bishop United States 11 646 342 260 213 138 19 1.3k
Lou Carey United States 6 949 1.5× 456 1.3× 245 0.9× 229 1.1× 126 0.9× 13 1.6k
Patrick Griffin Australia 18 993 1.5× 492 1.4× 190 0.7× 178 0.8× 89 0.6× 99 1.6k
Susan A. Yoon United States 23 767 1.2× 559 1.6× 339 1.3× 209 1.0× 165 1.2× 83 1.8k
Lina Markauskaitė Australia 21 1.1k 1.7× 444 1.3× 406 1.6× 334 1.6× 210 1.5× 104 1.9k
Julie Shattuck United States 7 732 1.1× 410 1.2× 173 0.7× 235 1.1× 136 1.0× 11 1.4k
Katja Buntins Germany 13 660 1.0× 240 0.7× 274 1.1× 260 1.2× 148 1.1× 24 1.3k
James A. Levin United States 20 797 1.2× 436 1.3× 127 0.5× 105 0.5× 150 1.1× 65 1.4k
Louis M. Gomez United States 22 782 1.2× 348 1.0× 109 0.4× 109 0.5× 228 1.7× 57 1.3k
Stephen M. Alessi United States 15 740 1.1× 646 1.9× 287 1.1× 235 1.1× 126 0.9× 35 1.7k
Wenhao David Huang United States 17 508 0.8× 485 1.4× 235 0.9× 257 1.2× 323 2.3× 43 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by M. J. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. J. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Bishop. The network helps show where M. J. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. J. Bishop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. J. Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. J. Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. J. Bishop. M. J. Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Hickey, Daniel T., et al.. (2014). Educational data sciences. 193–202. 47 indexed citations
2.
Spector, J. Michael, M. J. Bishop, & Dirk Ifenthaler. (2013). Educational communications and technology : issues and innovations. 40(14). 7639–7652. 4 indexed citations
3.
Spector, J. Michael, Margaret Merrill, Jan Elen, & M. J. Bishop. (2013). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Lirias (KU Leuven). 809 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Tryon, Patricia J. Slagter van & M. J. Bishop. (2012). Evaluating social connectedness online: the design and development of the Social Perceptions in Learning Contexts Instrument. Distance Education. 33(3). 347–364. 22 indexed citations
5.
Zhao, Xiaoli & M. J. Bishop. (2011). Understanding and supporting online communities of practice: lessons learned from Wikipedia. Educational Technology Research and Development. 59(5). 711–735. 17 indexed citations
6.
Santoro, Lana Edwards & M. J. Bishop. (2010). Selecting Software with Caution: An Empirical Evaluation of Popular Beginning Reading Software for Children with Early Literacy Difficulties. Computers in the Schools. 27(2). 99–120. 4 indexed citations
7.
Tryon, Patricia J. Slagter van & M. J. Bishop. (2009). Theoretical foundations for enhancing social connectedness in online learning environments. Distance Education. 30(3). 291–315. 106 indexed citations
8.
Bishop, M. J., et al.. (2009). Using the Jigsaw Model to Facilitate Cooperative Learning in an Online Course. Quarterly review of distance education. 10(1). 51–64. 17 indexed citations
9.
Bishop, M. J. & Sally A. White. (2007). The Clipper Project: Discovering What Online Courses Offer Residential Universities.. ˜The œEDUCAUSE quarterly/EDUCAUSE quarterly. 30(1). 14–20. 5 indexed citations
10.
Bishop, M. J., et al.. (2007). Sound’s use in instructional software to enhance learning: a theory-to-practice content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development. 56(4). 467–486. 14 indexed citations
11.
Bishop, M. J. & Sally A. White. (2007). The Clipper Project: Exploring Whether Early Engagement through Web-Based Instruction Can Help Ease High School Students' College Transition. Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice. 9(3). 357–376. 4 indexed citations
12.
Bishop, M. J., et al.. (2007). The clipper project: Lessons learned teaching an online economics course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 18(2). 99–120. 6 indexed citations
13.
Tryon, Patricia J. Slagter van & M. J. Bishop. (2006). Identifying "E-mmediacy" Strategies for Web-Based Instruction: A Delphi Study. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 7(1). 49–62. 12 indexed citations
14.
Brill, Jennifer M., M. J. Bishop, & Andrew Walker. (2006). The Competencies and Characteristics Required of an Effective Project Manager: A Web-Based Delphi Study. Educational Technology Research and Development. 54(2). 115–140. 152 indexed citations
15.
Bishop, M. J. & Lana Edwards Santoro. (2005). Evaluating beginning reading software for at‐risk learners. Psychology in the Schools. 43(1). 57–70. 13 indexed citations
16.
Bishop, M. J., et al.. (2005). Providing novice instructional designers real-world experiences: the pacificorp design and development competition. TechTrends. 49(2). 20–21. 4 indexed citations
17.
Cates, Ward Mitchell & M. J. Bishop. (2003). Learner as Bobsled Operator: The Physics of Learner Engagement. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 31(3). 291–305. 4 indexed citations
18.
Bishop, M. J. & Ward Mitchell Cates. (2001). Theoretical foundations for sound's use in multimedia instruction to enhance learning. Educational Technology Research and Development. 49(3). 5–22. 30 indexed citations
19.
Bishop, M. J. & Ward Mitchell Cates. (1996). A Door Is a Big Wooden Thing with a Knob: Getting a Handle on Metaphorical Interface Design. 1996(1). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026