M. de Wit
Impact in
- Food Science top 1%
- Botanical Research and Applications
- Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
- Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Papers in ⓘ
- Food Science 61
- Botanical Research and Applications 49
- Polysaccharides Composition and Applications 19
- Proteins in Food Systems 6
-
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies 12
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls 6
- Co-authors
- A. Hugo (46 shared papers)Gernot Osthoff (29 shared papers)A. Du Toit (24 shared papers)S.L. Venter (19 shared papers)Philip Nel (2 shared papers)Maryke Labuschagne (1 shared paper)Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan (2 shared papers)Alessandra Durazzo (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (6 papers)Polymers (3 papers)Agronomy (2 papers)Molecules (2 papers)Mammalian Biology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- South AfricaPortugalItaly
In The Last Decade
M. de Wit
67 papers receiving 737 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Food Science 585
- Biochemistry 71
- Forestry 45
- Nutrition and Dietetics 142
- Insect Science 106
Countries citing papers authored by M. de Wit
This map shows the geographic impact of M. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. de Wit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. de Wit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. de Wit. The network helps show where M. de Wit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 53 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 33 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 14 |
About M. de Wit
M. de Wit is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Animal Science and Zoology and Forestry, having authored 73 papers that have together received 806 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botanical Research and Applications (49 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (19 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (12 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (7 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (6 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (6 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (6 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (585 citations), Biochemistry (71 citations), Forestry (45 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (142 citations) and Insect Science (106 citations). M. de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Portugal and Italy. Frequent co-authors include A. Hugo, Gernot Osthoff, A. Du Toit, S.L. Venter, Philip Nel, Maryke Labuschagne, Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan, Alessandra Durazzo, B.C. Viljoen and Amélia Martins Delgado. Their work appears in journals such as Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Polymers, Agronomy, Molecules and Mammalian Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.