John Schulz

23 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

John Schulz
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 84
  • Computer Science Applications 31
  • Education 142
  • Gender Studies 33
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 40
Replace Ruth Sibson with:
Ruth Sibson Australia
Ασπασία Τόγια Greece
Rebecca M. Achen United States
Abdullah Abu-Tineh Qatar
David R. Earnest United States
Christopher Mensah Ghana
Émilie Vayre France
Kayla Sergent United States
Sebnem Cilesiz United States
Emine Gümüş Türkiye
John Schulz relative to Ruth Sibson Australia Ruth Sibson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Ruth Sibson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Schulz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Schulz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Schulz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Schulz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Schulz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Schulz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Schulz. The network helps show where John Schulz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside John Schulz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Schulz Line = papers co-authored together John Schulz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012110
2 201378
3 200641
4 200730
5 201424
6 202018
7 201617
8 201713
9 20099
10 19638
11 20206
12
Women’s Football: Still in the Hands of Men
20115
13
Analysing your interviews
20123
14 20192
15 20222
16 20152
17 20112
18
Paid staff in voluntary sporting organisations
20041
19 20091
20
What is a questionnaire
20121

About John Schulz

John Schulz is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 23 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (6 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (6 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (4 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (2 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (2 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (2 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (84 citations), Computer Science Applications (31 citations), Education (142 citations), Gender Studies (33 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (40 citations). John Schulz has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher John Auld, Michael Watkins, David E. Millard, Luke Greenacre, Anthony Kelly and Hugh Davis. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Research & Method in Education, Research in Learning Technology, Leisure/Loisir, Journal of Marketing for HIGHER EDUCATION and Cambridge Journal of Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact