Lois Frankel

488 total citations
10 papers, 311 citations indexed

About

Lois Frankel is a scholar working on Education, Cognitive Neuroscience and Human Factors and Ergonomics. According to data from OpenAlex, Lois Frankel has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 311 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Education, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics. Recurrent topics in Lois Frankel's work include Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers) and Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (3 papers). Lois Frankel is often cited by papers focused on Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers) and Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (3 papers). Lois Frankel collaborates with scholars based in United States. Lois Frankel's co-authors include Ou Lydia Liu, Katrina Crotts Roohr, Jun Xu, Eric G. Hansen, Hongwen Guo and Guangming Ling and has published in prestigious journals such as Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, ETS Research Report Series and CSUN ScholarWorks (California State University, Northridge).

In The Last Decade

Lois Frankel

10 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lois Frankel United States 6 238 73 24 23 20 10 311
Miki K. Tomita United States 6 392 1.6× 141 1.9× 23 1.0× 13 0.6× 20 1.0× 9 452
Gökhan Özdemir Türkiye 6 227 1.0× 125 1.7× 22 0.9× 17 0.7× 34 1.7× 21 300
Dewey I. Dykstra United States 6 242 1.0× 117 1.6× 15 0.6× 13 0.6× 30 1.5× 22 300
M. Sencer Çorlu Türkiye 9 245 1.0× 49 0.7× 19 0.8× 9 0.4× 11 0.6× 30 303
Roberta Y. Schorr United States 10 267 1.1× 70 1.0× 22 0.9× 12 0.5× 37 1.9× 25 316
Stephen L. Chew United States 8 139 0.6× 64 0.9× 17 0.7× 36 1.6× 18 0.9× 14 250
Jonathan L. Brendefur United States 10 351 1.5× 91 1.2× 22 0.9× 10 0.4× 20 1.0× 34 400
John Pegg Australia 10 328 1.4× 79 1.1× 13 0.5× 10 0.4× 9 0.5× 51 372
Behiye Ubuz Türkiye 12 396 1.7× 124 1.7× 20 0.8× 10 0.4× 16 0.8× 44 472
Thomas C. DeFranco United States 10 271 1.1× 81 1.1× 18 0.8× 7 0.3× 9 0.5× 24 305

Countries citing papers authored by Lois Frankel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lois Frankel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lois Frankel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lois Frankel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lois Frankel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lois Frankel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lois Frankel. The network helps show where Lois Frankel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lois Frankel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lois Frankel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lois Frankel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lois Frankel. Lois Frankel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Guo, Hongwen, Guangming Ling, & Lois Frankel. (2020). Using Existing Data to Inform Development of New Item Types. ETS Research Report Series. 2020(1). 1–16. 1 indexed citations
2.
Frankel, Lois, et al.. (2017). Expanding Audio Access to Mathematics Expressions by Students With Visual Impairments via MathML. ETS Research Report Series. 2017(1). 1–53. 6 indexed citations
3.
Frankel, Lois, et al.. (2016). Development and Initial Evaluation of the ClearSpeak Style for Automated Speaking of Algebra. Research Report. ETS RR-16-23.. ETS Research Report Series. 2 indexed citations
4.
Frankel, Lois, et al.. (2016). An Evaluation of the Usefulness of Prosodic and Lexical Cues for Understanding Synthesized Speech of Mathematics. Research Report. ETS RR-16-33.. ETS Research Report Series. 1 indexed citations
5.
Frankel, Lois, et al.. (2016). Development and Initial Evaluation of the ClearSpeak Style for Automated Speaking of Algebra. ETS Research Report Series. 2016(2). 1–43. 8 indexed citations
6.
Frankel, Lois, et al.. (2016). An Evaluation of the Usefulness of Prosodic and Lexical Cues for Understanding Synthesized Speech of Mathematics. ETS Research Report Series. 2016(2). 1–19. 8 indexed citations
7.
Liu, Ou Lydia, et al.. (2016). Assessing critical thinking in higher education: the HEIghten™ approach and preliminary validity evidence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 41(5). 677–694. 73 indexed citations
8.
Liu, Ou Lydia, Lois Frankel, & Katrina Crotts Roohr. (2014). Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment. Research Report. ETS RR-14-10.. ETS Research Report Series. 12 indexed citations
9.
Liu, Ou Lydia, Lois Frankel, & Katrina Crotts Roohr. (2014). Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next‐Generation Assessment. ETS Research Report Series. 2014(1). 1–23. 199 indexed citations
10.
Frankel, Lois, et al.. (2014). Navigable, Customizable TTS for Algebra. CSUN ScholarWorks (California State University, Northridge). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026